USA Today has a piece announcing that Smart cars-the tiny vehicle ubiqituous in Europe that launched Stateside in the summer-are sitting in the lots. Combine the recession with a dropping of gas prices, and people are less interested in buying Smarts. Or are they?The actual article, in typical trend piece fashion, doesn’t really back up the claims of the first paragraph. Yes, some people are asking for their fully refundable $99 deposit back and not buying the car, but Smart’s business model involves keeping virtually no cars on their lots, so it only takes a few rejects to start them “sitting in those lots.” The cars are moving, on average, in 28 days. The industry average (thanks, one would imagine to a lot of SUVs no one wants anymore) is 95 days.What people seem to not understand-as if their brain resets every year-is that the price gas is going to go up again in the summer, like it does every summer, and then they will want their Smart cars. For a few months, you wont be able to turn your head without seeing a frantic journalist ask if we will have $4-gallon gas forever (it will probably happen on this very site, even). Then, around September, gas prices will drop, and we’ll all forget about it until next summer.Maybe you want to buck the trend and buy a Smart car? You can do it here.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

