PETA has launched a new campaign to change the name we use to refer to those swimming things from “fish” to “sea kittens.” Here’s the rationale from PETA:”Would people think twice about ordering fish sticks if they were called sea kitten sticks? Would sea kitten soufflé be a hot seller at the local seafood restaurant? Does fillet o’ sea kitten sound even remotely appetizing?”I don’t know. I don’t imagine I’d ever try eating sea lion meat, but that doesn’t have much to do with the name. Catfish, on the other hand, is delicious in my experience.There’s plenty to be said for taking animal rights more seriously. Much of it has been said by Peter Singer. But trying to convince kids that 1) fish are very similar to cats and 2) the cuteness similarity is especially important because the value of an animal’s life is proportional to its cuteness seems irresponsible at best.Check out the Sea Kittens campaign here. Let’s hope kids pay more attention to their junior high biology teacher than PETA.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

