Portland is already proud of its copious parks and open green spaces, and now it’s moving the vegetation into the city in a big way, according to a piece in The New York Times. Working under the U.S. General Services Administration’s Office of Federal High-Performance Green Buildings, a $133 million renovation of the Edith Green-Wendell Wyatt Federal building downtown will include the addition of “vegetated fins” growing up the outer walls. An extension of similar vertical gardening ventures (the PNC Bank logo in Pittsburgh comes to mind), the goal for the renovation is to use the plants to make the building more energy efficient all year round-the fact that the design looks pretty damn cool is just a bonus.While designers are still working out the details, the fins are expected to grow to roughly 200 feet and allow the building to use up to 60 percent less energy, saving an estimated $280,000 annual energy costs. There are those who say the project is too costly-some even calling it one of “the 100 worst stimulus-financed projects.” The G.S.A insists that they energy efficiency will-assuming the designs function as planned-save money in the future. Early renderings of the building certainly look promising, but with the project’s estimated completion date being in 2013, it looks as though we’ll all just have to wait and see.Photo by Scott Baumberger via SERA Architects.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

