In England’s industrial center of Leeds, populations of bats, birds, and butterflies have been declining as urban areas expand into wild habitats. In the hopes of bringing animal populations back, a city-backed business council held a design competition for animal-friendly urban structures. The winner was 26-year old Neil Oxlee, who designed 40-foot towers that could function as urban high-rises for animals.Oxlee hopes that his towers could “provide a habitat for bats, birds, butterflies, insects and even foxes” although, as he says “I’m not an animal expert, if it goes further we’d need to get a wildlife expert on board… to see exactly which ones eat the other ones.”Indeed. But even if it’s hard to get foxes and sparrows living harmoniously in the same tower (and I suspect it would be), I could imagine some version of this idea working well for birds and insects, especially in dense urban spaces where actual trees are few and far between.Via Archinect.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

