Oil and power companies could face lawsuits from victims of violent floods or heatwaves where global climate change has intensified the levels of damage. At least, that’s what the Oxford University physicist Myles Allen told the Guardian:”We are starting to get to the point that when an adverse weather event occurs we can quantify how much more likely it was made by human activity. And people adversely affected by climate change today are in a position to document and quantify their losses. This is going to be hugely important.”Holding people accountable for their contributions to climate change sounds good, but we’ve all been at least somewhat complicit in contributing to it-the companies were just enablers. Still, lawyers are suggesting that normal rules of causation need not apply if a lawsuit might help prevent future injury.And, according to Owen Lomas, an environmental lawyer, situations where companies “funded disinformation to cast doubt on the link between man-made emissions and global warming” are the most likely to result in litigation.(Photo taken by Flickr user Senor Codo.)
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

