This is a question being taken up in D.C., where a sex-bias probe will determine whether area schools are forcing an equal male-female student body, despite higher application rates by women.The Civil Rights Commission is looking into it to see if women are getting shafted in acceptance rates, as the Washington Post reports. When the newspaper looked into admissions data at 12 D.C.-area schools, they found that seven admitted women at a lower rate than men.Female over-representation at the college level strikes me as a good-or at least not-bad-problem to have (god knows it hasn’t always been this way). But if schools keep letting in more and more of them, won’t they turn campuses into giant hen parties that are inhospitable and unappealing to other applicants?That’s sort of how the counterargument goes. “At some ambiguous tipping point, an institution may begin to appeal to a narrower demographic if it begins to appear more like a single-sex environment,” wrote one admissions dean recently.What do you think? Would it make a school more or less desirable to you if the student body were, say, 65 percent female or 65 percent male? Do you think colleges should be forced to accept men and women based only on their application packages and not based on 50-50 splits?
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

