The Economist has a nifty infographic, which compares the content of President Obama’s inaugural address with Wednesday night’s State of the Union.And while it was a far cry from 2002, when then-President George Bush introduced the world to his “axis of evil” theory, based on content alone, it appears that Obama has replaced talk of internationalism with domestic issues-namely America and jobs and just about anything having to do with the economy.But how does education compare?If you buy the theory that frequency of use corresponds to agenda setting, here’s something to ponder:Number of times Obama mentioned education in his 2009 inaugural address: 0.Number of times Obama mentioned education in his 2010 State of the Union: 5.And a very cool, interactive feature over at The New York Times, where can have lots of fun, further investigating Obama’s speech.What did you uncover?Photo via Getty Images.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

