Today the California Supreme Court upheld Proposition 8, the state’s gay marriage ban. The ban was approved by 52.24 percent of voters last November but anti-anti-gay marriage activists immediately challenged its legality.The anti-ban activists argued that rewriting the state Constitution to limit marriage to opposite-sex couples should require more than a simple majority vote on a ballot initiative. They were arguing, basically, that the rules make it too easy for the public to revise the Constitution in California.But, of course, that argument was a legal gambit. Their ultimate aim wasn’t to win a case about legislative procedure, it was to uphold the legality of gay marriage. And if you believe, like I do, that the anti-gay marriage camp is just on the wrong side of history, it’s not so bad that it remains easy to change California’s Constitution. That just means that young, more tolerant voters can overturn Proposition 8 all the sooner.Photo of Carrie Prejean via.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

