Slate has just released its annual Slate 60 list, its annual list of those who gave the most money to philanthropic causes in the last year. The winner, surprisingly, isn’t Bill Gates. Rather it’s the the Druckenmillers, who have given $705 million to their foundation which funds medical research. Second is John Templeton (who is, in fact, making this list posthumously), who donated to “support research into the relationships between science and religion, and spirituality and health, and to support programs that promote free enterprise and character development.” The Gateses, Bloomberg, and Louise Nippert round out the top five.The best news is that to crack the list this year, you only needed to give $10.6 million. Honor and glory are so tantalizingly close. Head over to Slate to see the full list of the most generous folks in America last year (excepting the fact that true generosity would probably be measured by what percent of a person’s total assets were given, not a strict dollar amount, in which case, this list would probably look a lot different, since most of these people are still incredibly wealthy after their gift, while some poorer people probably give away far more generous percentages of what they earn).
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

