George Tiller has long been the anti-abortion effort’s favorite target: The Kansas doctor’s clinic was bombed in 1986; he was shot in both arms by an opponent in 1993; his clinic was once blockaded for six straight weeks. Now, he’s catching heat again.He is one of the few doctors who performs late-term abortions in the country, and it’s unclear, according to reports, whether he got a valid second opinion (which is required by state law) before performing the procedures. He is being charged with 19 misdemeanors.The trial started yesterday, and it’s not the landmark case you might expect it. At issue isn’t the law permitting late-term abortion is certain instances, it’s whether or not Tiller met the requirements of those certain instances. We can expect lots of legalese, looking for loopholes, and he-said, she-said from both sides.The case is an outgrowth of a long battle between Kansas’s former Attorney General Phill Kline, and Tiller. At issue in this case is whether Tiller’s second opinions were valid, and whether the physician who provided them was his full-time employee (she testified that she was not).Ironically, the trial could result in a conviction of the doctor by a pro-choice Attorney General, who was appointed by President Obama’s very own Department of Health and Human Services Secretary nominee Kathleen Sebelius (who is already in hot water over the issue of abortion).Stay tuned.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

