The GOP primary has seemed a million miles away, but after a pair of Iowa events—the debate in Ames on Thursday and the straw poll today—the race is much more tangible. Don’t feel bad if you’re just tuning in now. We’ve created a handy matrix* to help you visualize how the candidates relate to one another ideologically (and where they fall in relation to President Obama) on both fiscal and social issues. In the most conservative quadrant, it’s a crowded field, which makes sense, given that primaries are all about pleasing your loyal base.


1) Michele Bachmann

Fiscal issues: Generally, Bachmann is extremely fiscally conservative, advocating a flat tax, leading the effort to repeal the Affordable Health Care Act, and refusing to vote “yes” on raising the debt ceiling down to the bitter end. But her hypocrisy stood in the way of a perfect score—her family has reportedly received farm subsidies and $137,000 in Medicaid money, and she voted for the economic stimulus before denouncing other stimulus bills later.

Social issues: Bachmann has taken extreme rightwing positions on everything from abortion to gay rights to immigration to the environment. In fact, she even signed a pact claiming black families were better off during slavery.

Key debate moment: Laying the smack down on Tim Pawlenty for questioning her record. We agree with her: Bachmann does indeed have a “very consistent record of fighting very hard against Barack Obama,” and even when Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid “ran Congress,” she “gave them a run for their money.”

2) Jon Huntsman

Fiscal issues: Huntsman welcomed stimulus money as governor of Utah and was appalled at the news that GE didn’t pay taxes, but otherwise he’s a staunch fiscal conservative. His political career was spawned from his father’s corporation, after all, and he introduced some pretty deep tax cuts in Utah (even if they didn’t amount to a “flat tax” as he’s claimed in the past).

Social issues: Hunstman has been turning liberal heads for his social politics, which are right-of-center and downright radical compared to his other competitors. He’s as anti-abortion as they come (he’s passed myriad anti-choice legislation, like a fetal pain law and a ban on second-trimester abortions). But he supports civil unions, cap-and-trade, and reasonable immigration policies. Most notably, he’s made headlines for being one of the GOP’s few anti-war candidates.

Key debate moment: When he made a moderate, state-based endorsement for civil unions—the only candidate to do so. “America can do a better job on equality,” he said.

3) Mitt Romney

Fiscal issues: Romney has got some ‘splainin’ to do in terms of health care policy; Massachusetts’ universal health care law was the model for the federal health reforms passed in 2009. But he makes up for it with his hatred of unions and love for the Bush tax cuts and corporations. Last week he declared that “corporations are people.”

Social issues: Romney has waffled on abortion, running as a pro-choice governor a decade ago, and he has endorsed some moves to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In fact, he’s famous for changing his stance on a whole host of issues. Now that he’s running in the primary again, he’s leaning to the right on everything from civil rights to immigration.

Key debate moment: Smiling and nodding. As his fellow debaters sparred, he mostly played it safe and avoided confrontation.

4) Rick Perry

Fiscal issues: He hasn’t even entered the race yet, but Perry, dubbed Bush 2.0, has been touting his fiscal-conservative bonafides. Based on his record as Texas governor, he passed both state budget cuts and property tax cuts, and has even called for the repeal of the 16th Amendment (although he also called for an increase in the state franchise tax, and took stimulus money from the federal government).

Social issues: Famous for being a climate-change denier, Perry is a social conservative on pretty much every issue. The one exception? He didn’t think Arizona’s draconian immigration law was the answer.

Key debate moment: He wasn’t there; Perry hadn’t yet announced his presidential bid.

5) Ron Paul

Fiscal issues: A professed fiscal libertarian, Paul gets nearly a perfect score for voting against the stimulus, the bank bailout, the auto industry bailout, consumer protections, new taxes, and Obama’s health care bill. He’s randomly thrown some money toward affordable housing, he thinks the government should get out of the way of business.

Social issues: He’s super conservative on nearly every issue except for a big one: war. He’s particularly against the U.S. involvement in Iraq, which he’s called “ill-considered,” “unnecessary,” and “not worth the price of American lives.” He’s also been relatively quiet on immigration issues—until recently, anyway.

Key debate moment: When he passionately denounced the Iraq War and debuted his new, hard-line immigration stance.

6) Herman Cain

Fiscal issues: Since Cain has never held public office, we can only go on what he’s said and done as CEO of Godfather’s Pizza—and not many people are more pro-business and anti-government than CEOs of huge corporations. Given that Cain wants to phase out Social Security and abolish the IRS in favor of a 23-percent sales tax, we have no choice but to give him a perfect score.

Social issues: He toes the party line when it comes to most social issues, although he couldn’t give a straight answer in the Ames debates when it came to his stance on war. He’s firmly anti-abortion and anti-civil rights, especially when it comes to Muslim Americans. He even opposes affirmative action, despite the fact that he was denied admission to college because he was black. Now that’s commitment.

Key debate moment: He didn’t get much screen time, but Cain managed to utter one deep thought when asked about his harsh immigration comment: “America has got to learn how to take a joke.”

7) Tim Pawlenty

Fiscal issues: The Minnesota governor is pretty damn conservative when it comes to cash: he’s slashed state spending and vowed not to raise taxes (although he did raise some fees). He’s been known in the past as a “Republican who cares about poverty,” but that rep is more about rhetoric than policy. Like Romney, he’s going to have to explain his initial endorsement of an individual health-care mandate to his base, which vehemently opposed the health care bill.

Social issues: Pawlenty is anti-abortion (except when the mother’s life is in danger), anti-gay rights, and very pro-war, although he’s going to have to live down his green past if he wants to fit in with people like Rick Perry. Then again, voters don’t seem to give a shit about climate change, anyway, so it may not hurt him too much.

Key debate moment: His spat with Michele Bachmann was just as important for his campaign as hers; he definitely came across as the meaner Minnesotan.

And for some context….

Barack Obama

It’s a little more difficult to assess where Obama sits on this chart, as presidents’ achievements are constrained by what they’re able to push through Congress. That said, here’s how Obama stacks up to his GOP challengers, based on a mix of his professed beliefs and his administration’s results:

Fiscal issues: The GOP has relentlessly vilified Obama as a huge spender, criticizing his stimulus bills and health-care plan. Obama has also been a big advocate for ending the Bush era tax cuts, a position that makes all of the GOP contenders balk. But he has yet to make any headway on raising taxes for the rich, and most of his spending has gone toward bailing out Wall Street and fueling three wars, rather than toward infrastructure or jobs programs. He did pass universal health care, but backed off when it came to offering a public option. Plus, he hinted at being okay with major budget cuts before the debt-ceiling debate even got started, which led to trillion-dollar cuts that Reagan would have envied. His mixed record puts him right-of-center when it comes to cash.

Social issues: We’ve seen a few major victories for women’s and civil rights during Obama’s presidency, including an official end to Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, free birth control under the health care act, and a successful fight to keep federal funding for Planned Parenthood and the EPA (although the latter may be threatened in the last round of debt-reducing cuts). He’s also appointed a diverse selection of judges. But his defense spending has gone up since Bush’s presidency, and though he publicly denounced Arizona’s draconian immigration bill, SB1070, a record amount of illegal immigrants have been deported under his administration. He’s taken a few baby steps toward environmental protections, but he’s suggested other initiatives that have been ignored by Congress.

*The numbers are a key, not a ranking. The candidates’ matrix positions were determined by an algorithm of a one through five rating, five being the most conservative. The categories for fiscal issues were taxes, budget, corporation-friendliness, health care, and government programs. For social issues, they were abortion and sex, civil rights, war, environment, and immigration.

  • Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away
    Dogs have impressive observational powers.Photo credit: Canva

    Reddit user Girlfriendhatesmefor’s three-year-old pitbull, Otis, had recently become overprotective of his wife. So he asked the online community if they knew what might be wrong with the dog.

    “A week or two ago, my wife got some sort of stomach bug,” the Reddit user wrote under the subreddit /r/dogs. “She was really nauseous and ill for about a week. Otis is very in tune with her emotions (we once got in a fight and she was upset, I swear he was staring daggers at me lol) and during this time didn’t even want to leave her to go on walks. We thought it was adorable!”

    His wife soon felt better, butthe dog’s behavior didn’t change.

    pregnancy signs, dogs and pregnancy, pitbull behavior, pet intuition, dog overprotection, Reddit stories, viral Reddit, dog instincts, canine emotions, dog owner tips
    Otis knew before they did. Canva

    Girlfriendhatesmefor began to fear that Otis’ behavior may be an early sign of an aggression issue or an indication that the dog was hurt or sick.

    So he threw a question out to fellow Reddit users: “Has anyone else’s dog suddenly developed attachment/aggression issues? Any and all advice appreciated, even if it’s that we’re being paranoid!”

    The most popular response to his thread was by ZZBC.

    Any chance your wife is pregnant?

    ZZBC | Reddit

    The potential news hit Girlfriendhatesmefor like a ton of bricks. A few days later, Girlfriendhatesmefor posted an update and ZZBC was right!

    “The wifey is pregnant!” the father-to-be wrote. “Otis is still being overprotective but it all makes sense now! Thanks for all the advice and kind words! Sorry for the delayed reply, I didn’t check back until just now!”

    Redditors responded with similar experiences.

    Anecdotal I know but I swear my dog knew I was pregnant before I was. He was super clingy (more than normal) and was always resting his head on my belly.

    realityisworse | Reddit

    So why do dogs get overprotective when someone is pregnant?

    Jeff Werber, PhD, president and chief veterinarian of the Century Veterinary Group in Los Angeles, told Health.com that “dogs can also smell the hormonal changes going on in a woman’s body at that time.” He added the dog may “not understand that this new scent of your skin and breath is caused by a developing baby, but they will know that something is different with you—which might cause them to be more curious or attentive.”

    The big lesson here is to listen to your pets and to ask questions when their behavior abruptly changes. They may be trying to tell you something, and the news may be life-changing.

    This article originally appeared last year.

  • Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.

  • ,

    Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

    Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.

    While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.

    When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.

    Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.


Explore More Articles Stories

Articles

Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away

Articles

14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations

Articles

Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

Articles

11 hilarious posts describe the everyday struggles of being a woman