For all but the most cavalier among us, nudity is kind of a big deal. It’s something we don’t share with just anyone. Indeed, public nudity and shame go hand in hand. However, a recent BBC TV experiment, in which strangers were made to interact with each other in the nude, reveals that this sense of shame can be unlearned. But where does that chagrin come from in the first place?According to the psychologist and professor Dan Fessler, of the University of California, Los Angeles, “Nudity is a threat to the basic social contract.” It is our social nature-and our lack of body hair/fur relative to other mammals-that has allowed nudity to become a problem for us. Because humans both mate for life (for the most part) and interact with so many other humans, nudity-and the sexual signals it sends off-poses a threat to “the mating pair.” We cover up, it would seem, to maintain order. Hence the abashment we feel when we’re exposed.Does that answer satisfy you? What about the idea of being evaluated or judged based on physical form? That seems to be an issue for men and women alike-and even those people who are proudest of their physiques don’t visit the supermarket in the buff.Is our fear of, or aversion to, public nudity something we should try to unlearn?Via Mental Floss.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

