The conservative pundit Michelle Malkin, who had previously joked about a countdown to a print media bailout, is currently cringing in response to the fact that one could actually come to pass for a number of local New England newspapers. In today’s National Review Online she asks:How “free” can a “free press” be if it is leveraged with government funding? How free would they be to criticize other corporate enterprises seeking local, state or federal help to keep them afloat in hard times? Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? A press beholden to the ruling class-a press that cannot stand on its own two feet and the strength of its product-is a press better off dead.There are, of course, valid counterpoints to the argument against government sponsored media: neither BBC News nor PBS has much trouble critiquing government or anyone. But given that so many media outlets are already beholden to the stranglehold of stockholders and staff-thinning, bottom-line-driven corporations, do they really need another set of hands around their necks?
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

