The Dan Brown Diversion
- Posted by: Anne Trubek
- on September 22, 2009 at 5:02 pm

Some say 2009 will be the novel’s best year ever—no thanks to The Lost Symbol.
What makes literary news? A new Dan Brown novel! Brown, the ginormous bestseller, published his long-awaited follow-up to that most-cited book on “what did you last read?” online profiles, The Da Vinci Code. I do not have the heart to search for numbers of copies of The Lost Symbol sold, so let’s just leave it at “more than one million.” Even better, the book was going cheap. Against any logic I can muster in my musty artsy brain, The Lost Symbol was offered for 50 percent off the day it was released.
The mega-book series Harry Potter announced another blockbuster, too. A new ride, “Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey,” will be unveiled at Universal’s Island of Adventure in Orlando next spring. It will cost $200 million dollars to create Hogsmeade station, Zonko’s, and Honeyduke, “where you can purchase an array of jokes and gags and sweets.” Hogwarts will be the “Parthenon of Orlando,” said the art director. The castle will not be a Disney castle, he continues, but “very real, based in fact” (huh?). A literary themepark is not a new idea—you can already jump on the “Great Expectations Boat Ride” at Dickens World in Kent.
Everyone covers these literary spectacles: CNN, New York Times Book Review, US Magazine. Brown and Potterworld may be middlebrow forms of conspicuous consumption, or they may be release valves that siphon off the pressures of cultural elitism. They both probably deliver on their promises of a good ride.
What I dislike about the press surrounding these events is the sanctimony that often accompanies what is, at root, an exercise in money-making. Somehow, because The Lost Symbol and Harry Potter are books, they are seen as somehow better, purer even, than, say, a network sitcom or unsponsored roller coaster. And news of their release eclipses other new books.
You wouldn’t know it watching the news, but a glut of incredible novels have been hitting the shelves all fall. This embarrassment of riches has led some, such as the Vroman’s Bookstore blog, to claim 2009 as the “best book year ever.” Better, even, than 1953 when Invisible Man beat out The Old Man and The Sea and East of Eden for the National Book Award.
Here is a partial list of excellent 2009 titles that aren’t by Dan Brown:
Lorrie Moore’s A Gate At The Stairs
Dan Chaon’s Await Your Reply
E.L. Doctorow’s Homer & Langley
Thomas Pynchon’s Inherent Vice
There are more to be published later this month and in October (just wait until Richard Powers’ Generosity comes out). The literary world is not lying down and giving in to easy reading. The contrary—the fall heavyweights seem to be lined up and ready to defend their corner. Bring on the Dan Brown. The American literary novel is alive and well—if not on CNN.













DISCUSSION: 6 Comments
What rot. People read Brown and Potter because they’re interesting, touching, imaginative books. I read them not because I want to be fashionable or to ‘divert’ from ‘highbrow books.’ I read what I like, and I never read something gloomy and depressive, and I bet that’s what those five books are. Despair is a sin, not a virtue. If you don’t like this world, commit suicide and don’t pretend depression is something noble. I know firsthad it isn’t – I suffer from it at times, but I don’t write books all about now world is awful.
My mark to this rot is not “GOOD”. It’s FAIL. ABSOLUTE ZERO BY KELVIN’S SCALE.
I agree that the media is ignoring alot of fantastic new reads so they can blitz Dan Brown’s latest. They also did that with the Harry Potter novels. I find it interesting, though, that the author of this article only thinks literature is being ignored. W.E.B. Griffin had a fantastic release just a few weeks ago that got ignored and shouldn’t have. Is it not worth the time to mention because it wasn’t brainy?
“110 year old father: dreams, hope & triumph …from Barack Obama’s motherland should be on the best sellers list
If people truly love to read, they are going to find good books, regardless of whether they get the “star treatment” that Dan Brown or the Harry Potter books get. Yes, I have read all the Harry Potter books – like HissingCat, I read them because they were imaginative, suspenseful, and a lot of fun to read. I’ve also read both The Da Vinci Code and Angels and Demons. However, I also read many books that aren’t on the best-seller lists, particularly non-fiction. I read the book reviews in my local newspaper and in the newsmagazines such as Time and Newsweek, and if a book sounds interesting, I’ll get it from my local library. I also talk to staff at local independent bookstores to see what they recommend, as well as getting suggestions from friends with similar tastes. I will admit that I tend towards lighter books much of the time – but only because there’s enough darkness in the REAL world without my reading about it. It’s the same reason I don’t go to some admittedly excellent and highly-rated movies such as “No Country for Old Men” and “There Will be Blood” – too depressing for my tastes.
I think Dan Brown needs to find a new plot…Lost Symbol is the same as Da Vinci Code, same as Angels and Demons, same story different names and places…borrrrrrrrinnnnggggThe best read I have had this year is Stieg Larsson’s series…The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo and The Girl Who Plays with Fire, can’t wait for the last one to be published here in the states. Good stories and plots and characters you love and hate..