Erica Grieder’s weekly series explores how businesses are responding to consumers, governments, and markets to make their practices and their products more sustainable.


When my friend came to visit Austin from her home in Spain, I took her out for the finest gourmet fast-food burrito available within a mile of my house. She had never been to a Chipotle Mexican Grill.

A placard touted the chain’s commitment to respectable food sourcing: happy pigs, healthy chickens, local produce, etc. When I asked, the three women working assured me that people care about that campaign. Customers, one added, ask about it all the time. My friend, peering over the counter, wasn’t one of them. She was excited about the brown rice. If you eat corn, rice, and beans together, she said, you get exactly the right amino acids to make a perfect protein.

Good food is a complicated topic. As is often the case, the best approach depends on your ethical priorities and personal constraints. Some animal-rights advocates emphasize the need to eat humanely raised meat; others hold out for vegetarianism or veganism. Environmentalists worry about pesticides, soil depletion, and the energy used in producing ingredients. Grad students get curious about plant-based proteins.

The interesting thing about Chipotle, the burrito and taco chain, is that it has tried to tackle all these goals and more. Its “Food with Integrity” philosophy calls for free-range meat, hormone-free dairy, and locally sourced produce when practical. For more than ten years, Chipotle has bought its pork through Niman Ranch, a sustainable farm based in California. As of last year, for example, all of the beef in its barbacoa is naturally raised, meaning that the cows are not treated with hormones or antibiotics, and they are fed an entirely vegetarian diet.

Steve Ells, the co-founder and CEO, has explained that he was first moved to go green in the quest for better flavor. But the idea, as the company describes it now, is to use ingredients “raised with respect for the animals, the environment, and the farmers.” No other fast-food chain has tried that, although most have tweaked their menus to accommodate various consumer concerns, at least superficially—McDonald’s, for example, now offers apple slices in its Happy Meals.

And in recent years, few chain restaurants have been as successful as Chipotle. In the third quarter of 2011 the chain’s revenue was $592 million, up 24.1 percent from the third quarter a year ago. Some of the extra money came from new restaurants—Chipotle opened 32 new spots during those three months, bringing its national total to 1,162. The revenue increase also reflects a rise in sales, up 11.2 percent.

Chipotle is not the fastest-growing fast-food chain in America. That would be Five Guys Burgers and Fries, according to a March analysis of chains with more than $200 million in sales from research firm Technomic . But it may be the most notable, precisely because of the fuss it makes over food issues. The Food with Integrity philosophy commits Chipotle to higher input costs and supply-chain risk. Premium meat, for example, costs more than the factory-farmed kind, and there are fewer people supplying it.

Chipotle’s approach has attracted admiration and irritation. “They tell the customers the story of where the food comes from,” philosopher Peter Singer said in a 2006 interview with an Australian television program, “whereas the typical fast food chain does exactly the reverse—it tries to hide where it comes from.”

But it can all become a little sanctimonious for a burrito chain. In August, Chipotle released a lushly animated ad, set to Willie Nelson’s cover of “The Scientist,” that seems to imply that the chain, in its role as a big buyer of sustainable food, can solve the problems of factory farming, highway congestion, air pollution, water pollution, and, if I’m following this correctly, 21st-century malaise.

The debate is inevitable. Chipotle is still a fast-food company, not a locavore bistro. Nobody is cuddling the chickens; the carnitas pigs aren’t like their pampered Spanish cousins that only eat acorns. If the avocados from California aren’t available, Chipotle will buy them from Chile or Mexico. It can only be as green as its business model allows, but to the extent that it is green, it might as well talk it up.

The marketing campaign might actually have some positive externalities. Setting aside the integrity chatter, a more parsimonious explanation for Chipotle’s success would be that it’s selling good burritos in a country where good burritos are widely appreciated but occasionally scarce. In some cities, Chipotle could credibly claim that it has the best burrito in town. In others, it could at least claim to be better than Taco Bell, which was sued earlier this year by an Alabama law firm claiming that its “taco meat filling” is only 36 percent beef. Even in Austin, which has plenty of Mexican and Tex-Mex food—not to mention enough local, organic, vegan, and macrobiotic options to placate the most virtuous eater—the market supports several bustling Chipotles.

That matters because Chipotle clearly thinks its customers care about hormone-free cheese. Even if most of them don’t, Chipotle is the first big fast-food chain to make food quality an integral part of its branding. As such, it’s helping to buoy the market for ethically sourced food—and if that’s what the burrito fans are getting, they may be getting used to expecting it.

Photo courtesy of Chipotle

  • Air Force graduate tears up when friend steps in to ‘tap him out’ during graduation
    Photo credit: CanvaA lone soldier and friends celebrating.

    Sometimes the biggest moments in our lives might slip by unnoticed. That’s exactly what was happening to Airman Joel Usher. At his United States Air Force graduation ceremony, he stood alone, already knowing that no family members were coming to celebrate the occasion.

    Many people know what it feels like to hit a major milestone and wish someone were there. Usher was visibly emotional as fellow graduates reunited with cheering family members. Suddenly, a friend he made during training stepped forward. Phone in hand, recording the moment, he walked up to “tap him out.”

    @slimgudda305

    1 year ago today. it’s been a journey man still can’t believe i’ve made it this far but is only the beginning more blessing to come💫#fypシ #militarytapout #explorepage

    ♬ Gods creation – daniel.mp3

    A teary-eyed moment defined by friendship

    Caught completely off guard, a teary-eyed Usher smiles, turning what could have been a lonely memory into one defined by friendship. He posted the video on TikTok with a title overlay reading, “i had no one at my graduation to tap me out but that one good friend i met during training found me and come through for me…”

    At military graduations, there’s a tradition known as “tapping out.” Family members or close supporters step forward at the end of the ceremony to officially greet and escort the graduates away. According to the AF WingMoms, it can be an emotional experience, but the Air Force views its military purpose as a productive way to maintain orderly disbursement.

    An overwhelming gesture

    In an exclusive interview with People, Usher described how important that kind act was, leaving him holding back tears:

    “When my friend tapped me out, I was overwhelmed in the best way possible. It wasn’t just about finishing, it was about having someone there who truly had my back in that moment.”

    Usher went on to explain that the achievement was important, but the friendship and support shown to him are what he remembers most. After sharing the moment online, he was surprised by all the feedback. He believes the overwhelming response was a strong reminder of the beauty behind meaningful acts of kindness.

    airman graduation, military support, chosen family, military friendship, tapping out, tap him out
    Best friends take a group selfie.
    Photo credit: Canva

    TikTok post resonates

    After 4.6 million views, people flooded the comments with emotional reactions. For some, the small gesture perfectly captured the kind of bond people form while going through difficult experiences together. This wasn’t a performative moment—just someone refusing to let another person experience an important occasion alone.

    For others, it was heartbreaking. Often, soldiers don’t have family members who are able to make the trip, or they find themselves on a solitary journey. Either way, the idea that people can accomplish something amazing and still be left to stand alone afterward can be difficult to swallow.

    Here are some of the comments:

    “i’m glad you made a good friend along the way who came looking for ya. those are the meaningful connections you make while in the military”

    “now this just broke my heart”

    “Those teary eyes”

    “This just breaks my heart! Everyone should have someone tap them out. So much respect for the military”

    “The pain in bros eyes. Went to my soul. Brother we are here for u! Ty for serving”

    “sometimes thats all we need! Just one good friend”

    “I’m so sorry no one from your bloodline was there for you in that moment but you have all of TikTok cheering you on and we are so proud of your accomplishments”

    “Ex military that tap means more than you think.”

    “i really wish they had a volunteer program for something like this… let other mamas and dads come and be there for these young men and women.. we never know how bad they just need SOMEONE to be there for them”

    “Been there my man. But you’re going to be an amazing soldier. Use that to be the best you can be”

    The mix of responses shows why meaningful moments shouldn’t be faced alone. Friendship and community are defined by simple choices: stepping in, showing up, and refusing to let a proud day also become someone’s loneliest. These small acts turn milestone accomplishments into memories carried forward with a tearful, joyful smile.

  • 59% of Americans worry about sunscreen chemicals. Only 32% understand how sunscreen works.
    Two persons applying sunscreen while sitting on a beach.

    Tiffany Miller for Melanoma Research Alliance

    Many Americans think of sunscreen at the beach. Fewer consider wearing it for the drive there. And many are questioning if they should wear sunscreen at all.

    These trends, uncovered in a new national survey from the nonprofit Melanoma Research Alliance (MRA), highlight a central challenge in skin cancer prevention.

    Skin cancer is the most common form of cancer in the United States, according to the CDC. Nine in 10 skin cancers, including melanoma, are linked to exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation, according to the MRA. Reducing exposure to UV radiation lowers the risk of skin cancer, making sunscreen a key part of prevention.

    A survey of 2,000 adults found that most Americans have a basic understanding of the risks of sun exposure, but that awareness doesn’t always translate into action. More than 8 in 10 recognize that spending long hours in the sun contributes to melanoma risk, yet roughly one-quarter say they rarely or never use sunscreen when spending time outdoors.

    Then there are those everyday moments that most people don’t recognize as risky. The light coming through the window over the sink. The short walk from the parking lot. The hour in the bleachers with the sun hitting one side of your face. A single sunburn can be dangerous, but it’s the accumulation of exposure over time that often drives risk.

    Sunscreen is widely recognized as an effective tool for skin cancer prevention, yet confusion and misinformation persist, especially on social media. Fifty-three percent of respondents say they have seen claims that sunscreen ingredients may be harmful. Fifty-nine percent say they are concerned about what’s in sunscreen, and 38% don’t believe sunscreen is safe and effective.

    An infographic on Melanoma Research Alliance's surveys on sunscreen facts and usage.

    Many Americans also say they aren’t sure how sunscreen works. Only about a third can correctly explain the difference between types of sunscreens, while a much larger share reports being unsure.

    Sunscreen works by absorbing or blocking UV radiation from reaching the skin, preventing DNA damage that can cause skin cancer. In the United States, the active ingredients in sunscreen undergo rigorous review by the Food and Drug Administration, which evaluates them as over-the-counter drugs. This drug-level standard requires extensive testing and contributes to a more limited set of approved UV filters compared with Europe, where sunscreens are regulated as cosmetics. The FDA is currently evaluating additional methodologies for assessing sunscreen ingredients, a process that could expand the number of approved UV filters available to U.S. consumers.

    All of this is unfolding during a period of real progress in melanoma research. While melanoma remains the deadliest form of skin cancer, more than 8,500 Americans are expected to die from it in 2026, roughly one person every hour, according to the American Cancer Society. Recent advances are improving outcomes for many patients with advanced disease, though approximately 50% of patients do not respond to current treatments, according to MRA, underscoring why prevention and early detection remain critical.

    Survey methodology: The Melanoma Research Alliance commissioned Atomik Research to conduct an online survey of 2,000 U.S. adults between March 27 and April 1, 2026. The sample is nationally representative based on gender, age, and geography. Margin of error: ±2 percentage points at a 95% confidence level. Atomik Research, part of 4media group, is a creative market research agency.

    This story was produced by Melanoma Research Alliance and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.

  • The salary you need to live comfortably in 100 US cities
    A view of the San Antonio River walkway in San Antonio, Texas.
    ,

    The salary you need to live comfortably in 100 US cities

    Big-city comfort comes with a six-figure price tag.

    Jaclyn DeJohn, CFP for SmartAsset

    To truly understand the context of a household’s income, it must be compared to local costs and long-term goals, which both may fluctuate over time. For most people, the same pillars will make up the biggest nonnegotiables in their budget. These include basic necessities like housing, groceries, utilities, and transportation, and likely some discretionary spending on hobbies, activities, and other enrichment. In an attempt to secure this lifestyle for the future, many households aim to save some of their income for emergencies, investments, retirement, education, and other long-term goals. A common budgeting technique that encapsulates these three pillars is called the 50/30/20 rule: 50% of your post-tax income goes to needs, 30% to your wants, and 20% gets set aside for the future.

    With this in mind, SmartAsset assessed the salary needed to reach this 50/30/20 ideal — designated as a comfortable salary — based on the local costs in 100 of the largest U.S. cities.

    Key Findings

    • A single adult needs to earn $150,000 to live comfortably in these places. New York has the highest individual salary needed to live comfortably at $158,954. San Jose, California, follows closely at $158,080. Orange County cities Irvine, Anaheim, and Santa Ana require an estimated $151,965 in income for a single adult.
    • These cities have the lowest salary needed to live comfortably. San Antonio has the lowest salary threshold for both single adults and families of four at $83,242 and $192,608, respectively. New Orleans has the second-lowest salary needed for a single adult to live comfortably at $84,406, followed by Memphis, Tennessee, at $86,320.
    • The Bay Area is the most expensive place for a family to live comfortably. Bay Area cities make up the top four of the five places with the highest salary needed for a family of four to live comfortably. Incomes across two parents are projected at $407,597 in San Francisco, $402,771 in San Jose, and $371,488 in both Fremont and Oakland. Boston rounds out the top five at $368,742.
    • Families in these Texas cities are closest to a comfortable salary. In Frisco, the median household earns $145,444 — substantially higher than the national median of $83,730. This figure also accounts for 63.1% of the $230,464 income a family of four in Frisco needs to live comfortably. In McKinney, the $124,177 median household income accounts for 53.9% of the $230,464 needed.
    Table listing the top cities by the lowest annual salary needed for a single adult to live in sustainable comfort using the 50/30/20 budgeting rule.

    10 Cities With the Highest Salary Needed to Live Comfortably

    1. New York, New York

    • Salary needed for a single adult: $158,954
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $337,875
    • Median household income: $81,228

    2. San Jose, California

    • Salary needed for a single adult: $158,080
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $402,771
    • Median household income: $148,226

    3. (tie) Irvine, California

    • Salary needed for a single adult: $151,965
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $327,226
    • Median household income: $145,731

    3. (tie) Anaheim, California

    • Salary needed for a single adult: $151,965
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $327,226
    • Median household income: $101,145

    3. (tie) Santa Ana, California

    • Salary needed for a single adult: $151,965
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $327,226
    • Median household income: $95,118

    6. Boston, Massachusetts

    • Salary needed for a single adult: $139,776
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $368,742
    • Median household income: $97,791

    7. (tie) San Diego, California

    • Salary needed for a single adult: $136,781
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $312,915
    • Median household income: $111,032

    7. (tie) Chula Vista, California

    • Salary needed for a single adult: $136,781
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $312,915
    • Median household income: $105,101

    9. San Francisco, California

    • Salary needed for a single adult: $134,950
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $407,597
    • Median household income: $139,801

    10. (tie) Fremont, California

    • Salary needed for a single adult: $134,410
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $371,488
    • Median household income: $175,816

    10. (tie) Oakland, California

    • Salary needed for a single adult: $134,410
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $371,488
    • Median household income: $102,235

    10 Cities With the Lowest Salary Needed to Live Comfortably

    1. San Antonio, Texas
    • Salary needed for a single adult: $83,242
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $192,608
    • Median household income: $66,176
    1. New Orleans, Louisiana
    • Salary needed for a single adult: $84,406
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $197,766
    • Median household income: $58,821
    1. Memphis, Tennessee
    • Salary needed for a single adult: $86,320
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $193,939
    • Median household income: $52,679
    1. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
    • Salary needed for a single adult: $86,861
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $213,325
    • Median household income: $70,040
    1. Baltimore, Maryland
    • Salary needed for a single adult: $87,485
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $224,224
    • Median household income: $64,778
    1. Louisville, Kentucky
    • Salary needed for a single adult: $88,234
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $212,742
    • Median household income: $67,251
    1. Tulsa, Oklahoma
    • Salary needed for a single adult: $88,317
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $215,238
    • Median household income: $60,930
    1. Winston-Salem, North Carolina
    • Salary needed for a single adult: $88,442
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $205,421
    • Median household income: $57,758
    1. Tucson, Arizona
    • Salary needed for a single adult: $88,899
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $218,400
    • Median household income: $60,483
    1. Fort Wayne, Indiana
    • Salary needed for a single adult: $88,982
    • Salary needed for a working family of four: $233,126
    • Median household income: $61,436

    Data and Methodology

    SmartAsset used MIT Living Wage Calculator data to gather the basic cost of living for an individual with no children and for two working adults with two children. Data includes the cost of necessities, including housing, food, transportation, and income taxes. It was last updated to reflect the most recent data available on Feb. 15, 2026.

    Applying these costs to the 50/30/20 budget for 100 of the largest U.S. cities, MIT’s living wage is assumed to cover needs (i.e., 50% of one’s budget). From there, the total annual wage was extrapolated for individuals and families to spend 30% of the total on wants and 20% on savings or debt payments. Median household income data for cities comes from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 1 Year American Community Survey for 2024.

    This story was produced by SmartAsset and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.

Explore More Stories

Well-being

You know exercise is good for you – so why is it so hard to put it into practice?

Society

Foreign aid’s hidden benefit: Recipients are more likely to pay the generosity forward

Health

Photographic memory is a myth – here’s what research really says about remembering

Well-being

How workplace stress hijacks the nervous system to cause headaches − and a neurologist’s guide to managing them