What are the key elements to breakthrough research? Time, risk, and the possibility of failure, says a new paper out of MIT. These factors, which encourage creativity and out-of-box thinking, are “much more likely” to yield innovative and influential research as compared to the kind of short-term, results-oriented research that is the norm.The report, titled “Incentives and Creativity: Evidence from the Academic Life Sciences,” opens with a great anecdote about a scientist who, when he was awarded a grant from NIH, was was strongly discouraged from pursuing a certain study-it just seemed too out there. He pursued it anyway, and in 2007 won the Nobel Prize for a technique he’d developed thanks to that initial research.There are countless other examples, and they all point to this same idea: That the short-term research project model-de rigeur at research universities-is not without merit, but doesn’t yield the kind of breakthrough innovation the longer-term grants do, either. I imagine their research can be fairly applied to other kinds of grant giving as well, from the nonprofit and foundation world, say.You can read the entire paper here.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

