Yesterday, Obama announced he’d be giving $3.4 billion in stimulus funds to projects aimed at modernizing our outdated energy grid. The goal is to build a “smart grid” that moves energy more efficiently, has real-time monitoring, can coordinate with energy-efficient appliances, and can link up our cities with sources of renewable energy like wind or solar power.If we build it right we’ll get lower electricity bills for everyone and lower carbon emissions. (You can see what our current energy grid looks like here and here.)The grants are going to 100 companies, cities, and utilities. The money will pay for new power lines, smart meters, and lots of equipment (“substations” and “smart transformers”) that will help reduce power outages.The map above shows which kinds of projects are happening where. Despite the rigid, color-coded categorization, there’s a lot of overlap in what these different types of projects do (get into the details with this .pdf of all the projects by category if you like). The most exciting projects involve getting functioning smart meters into homes and businesses and those generally fall under “Advanced Metering Infrastructure.” So congratulations to Maine, the Mississippi area, Oregon, the four corners, and San Diego. Only Alaska got totally neglected. There are more details over at the White House blog.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

