There have been a great series of pieces on the Times small-business blog You’re the Boss about what effects the various health-care bills will have on how these businesses provide or don’t provide health care for various classes of workers. The consensus seems to be that all the businesses are going to have to spend more on health care, but also will find loopholes that will involve fewer of their employees being covered. Everyone loses.This begs the question to our business-minded readers and coworkers: Why can’t we just have a full mandate and think of insuring employees properly as a mandatory sunk business cost? Can’t find a way to pay for health care for your employees? Guess you need to rethink your business model. Businesses already do this with things like taxes. You know you have to pay them, and you need to figure them into accounting. It seems like it shouldn’t be any different with health insurance.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

