As this health care business heats up, so does talk about how to pay for it. Interesting piece on Andrew Sullivan’s blog this morning about one idea being floated that involves capping charitable donations (which are then written off on people’s taxes). If it picked up steam, and it probably won’t, it would hit the rich hard because, in the simplest of terms, wealthy donors wouldn’t be able to write off as much, and thus would have to pay higher income tax. By removing a key incentive for giving, it would also, of course, hit nonprofits hard as well.In Conor Clarke’s piece, he argues that any way you cut it, the way we treat charitable donations is regressive. “The deduction is unfair,” he writes. “You can deduct gifts from your income tax liability at your top marginal rate. So, if you are in the highest tax bracket you can deduct $350 for a $1000 donation. If you are in the lowest tax bracket you can only deduct $150 on a $1000 donation.”He goes on to explain that while most of us think of charitable giving as donating to your favorite nonprofit or the Sally Ann, that actually there are many more organizations that qualify and not all of them are terribly, um, charitable.It’s an interesting ides, but a controversial one of course. There have been a few ideas floated recently that involve taxing/targeting the rich, all of which feel very Canadian to me. It’ll be interesting to see what happens.Image via
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

