California, which is leaking money like a leaky bucket, is no longer able to make all the payments it needs to make. Instead, the state is issuing IOUs to some of the people it should be sending checks to, on the assumption that at some point the state will have more money and can pay them back (this assumption, while historically accurate, also seems dangerous). So, who gets the IOUs? Felix Salmon posted the handy chart above.What we see here is that anyone who really needs money right now-people on temporary assistance, mental health patients, those in drug rehab-they get an IOU. Anyone who, say, works for the UC system or the correctional system-people who might have enough cash in the bank to skip a paycheck or two-get their checks like nothing happened. It can’t be a coincidence that most of the people offered IOUs seem fairly unlikely to have the time or wherewithal to redeem them at the nebulous point in the future when California deems it has enough money to pay them. Nice trick.The worst part of this chart is the legislators continuing to get paid. Shouldn’t the people who have failed several times to offer a feasible budget be the first people who take a pay cut when they run out of money?
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

