It’s been a bad couple of days for the endangered species lobby. Yesterday, the Times reported that when the all-seeing Government Accountability Office found huge holes in the ways in which the Fish and Wildlife Service track threats to animal species. This is not good for a number of reasons.Put simply, the Endangered Species Act-which has been in the news lately-requires that monitoring reports be made to keep track of animals and plants that are in trouble. That way, when federal agencies consult with the FWS over something like the building of a new road or dam-which is required by the ESA-the FWS has some strong backup when they say something like “That dam will basically render salmon extinct.”But at field offices that GAO visited, says the Times, “FWS biologists could not find monitoring reports for 63 percent of species that required them.”Now hold your horses. Obviously the FWS wasn’t doing nothing, but methods varied and weren’t streamlined enough for the GAO. And since the FWS has responded kindly, and is cooperating, there’s no serious cause for alarm. Also, there’s a sympathetic administration in place, so now’s a good time to get these processes in place, in case our next one, like our last one, isn’t animals’ best friend.If you want to read the whole thing, click here.Image via
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

