Using data primarily from the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), FutureMajority.com put together some eye-catching numbers on the youth impact on the 2008 election. The youth vote (the number of ballot-casters under 30) was up 3.4 million over the turnout in the Kerry/Bush election of 2004, rising to 23 million voters, 18 percent of the total electorate. According to a CNN report, 62 percent of eligible voters chimed in on the presidential election–a rise of 2 percent over the 2004 election; CIRCLE’s data says that young voters accounted for 60 percent of that uptick.If the youth vote was the only voice in the election, Obama would have won 455 electoral votes–91 more than he has in the official count. On This Week with George Stephanopoulos yesterday, a roundtable including Fareed Zakaria and David Gergen discussed how the immense support shown for Obama by young voters–he outpolled McCain 66 to 32 in this group–could lead to a generational love-affair with the Democrats, similar to the Reagan effect of 28 years ago. That’s of course provided that Obama’s presidency is seen as a success.It’s a tough task. The economy is in ruin. We are in two wars. But, there seems to be a tide of hope. In order to preserve this tide of enthusiasm from the nation’s youngsters, Obama has a lot of work to do.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

