New Study Shows Uber And Lyft Riders Endure Worse Treatment If They’re Black Or Women

If you're not a white male, you can take some measures to ensure fair treatment.

Uber and Lyft might be slowly replacing taxis but when it comes to the issues that female and Black passengers faced with hailing cabs, ride sharing services regrettably seem to be carrying on the tradition of preferential treatment for male and White passengers.

A troubling new study from the National Bureau of Economic Research found that black riders of both UberX and Lyft services waited 16-28% longer than white riders. The study consisted of the examination of 1,500 rides in the Boston and Seattle metropolitan areas.

In Boston, men with African or African-American-sounding names had their rides canceled twice as often as white passengers.

The study also broke down the wait times and cancellation rates based on gender, finding that African-American women had a cancellation rate of 8.4% compared to a rate of 5.4% for white women.

Black riders, regardless of gender, found a staggering 15.7% of their rides canceled if they found themselves in less densely-populated areas.

Similar issues were found in comparing the experiences of white women to those of white men. Women were more likely to be overcharged as drivers started the meter early or waited to end the trip until long after they’d already dropped off their fare.

It was also found that drivers systematically took longer routes with female riders.

Though it may serve as little solace to the offended parties, it’s possible that a few particularly egregious offenders may be skewing the data reported. Says Stephen M. Zoepf from the Center for Automotive Research and co-author of the study, "It seems to be a few bad actors. A few drivers were taking routes that were five-times as long as they should be."

Almost uniformly, regardless of gender or race, drivers were more inclined to take longer trips when surge pricing was in effect, capitalizing on the higher fares.

A rep from Uber has responded to the study. Released to Bloomberg, the statement reads:

Discrimination has no place in society and no place on Uber. We believe Uber is helping reduce transportation inequities across the board, but studies like this one are helpful in thinking about how we can do even more.

Ultimately, platforms such as Uber and Lyft have little control over the actions of their drivers, but in the interest of social responsibility, hopefully they’ll monitor their metrics as closely as this study did to create awareness of the racism that seems inherent in the services provided by their drivers.

The study suggests there are steps users can take to ensure fair treatment by keeping their race or identity from being a consideration. It’s suggested riders keep their names or photos off their profiles to the extents possible. The services could address the issue by offering flat-fare rides for short trips and penalizing drivers further for canceled trips, performing statistical analysis of driver habits to identify egregious offenders.

via Honor Africans / Twitter

The problem with American Sign Language (ASL) is that over 500,000 people in the U.S. use it, but the country has over 330 million people.

So for those with hearing loss, the chances of coming into contact with someone who uses the language are rare. Especially outside of the deaf community.

Keep Reading Show less

Looking back, the year 1995 seems like such an innocent time. America was in the midst of its longest streak of peace and prosperity. September 11, 2001 was six years away, and the internet didn't seem like much more than a passing fad.

Twenty-four years ago, 18 million U.S. homes had modem-equipped computers, 7 million more than the year before. Most logged in through America Online where they got their email or communicated with random strangers in chat rooms.

According to a Pew Research study that year, only 32% of those who go online say they would miss it "a lot" if no longer available.

Imagine what those poll numbers would look like if the question was asked today.

RELATED: Bill and Melinda Gates had a surprising answer when asked about a 70 percent tax on the wealthiest Americans

"Few see online activities as essential to them, and no single online feature, with the exception of E-Mail, is used with any regularity," the Pew article said. "Consumers have yet to begin purchasing goods and services online, and there is little indication that online news features are changing traditional news consumption patterns."

"Late Night" host David Letterman had Microsoft founder and, at that time the richest man in the world, on his show for an interview in '95 to discuss the "the big new thing."

During the interview Letterman chided Gates about the usefulness of the new technology, comparing it to radio and tape recorders.

Gates seems excited by the internet because it will soon allow people to listen to a baseball game on their computer. To which Letterman smugly replies, "Does radio ring a bell?" to laughter from the crowd.

But Gates presses Letterman saying that the new technology allows you to listen to the game "whenever you want," to which Letterman responds, "Do tape recorders ring a bell?"

Gates then tells Letterman he can keep up with the latest in his favorite hobbies such as cigar smoking or race cars through the internet. Letterman shuts him down saying that he reads about his interests in magazines.

RELATED: Bill Gates has five books he thinks you should read this summer.

The discussion ends with the two laughing over meeting like-minded people in "troubled loner chat room on the internet."

The clip brings to mind a 1994 segment on "The Today Show" where host Bryant Gumbel and Katie Couric have a similar discussion.

"What is internet anyway?" an exasperated Gumball asks. "What do you write to it like mail?"

"It's a computer billboard but it's nationwide and it's several universities all joined together and it's getting bigger and bigger all the time," a producer explains from off-stage.

Photo by Li-An Lim on Unsplash

The future generations will have to live on this Earth for years to come, and, not surprisingly, they're very concerned about the fate of our planet. We've seen a rise in youth activists, such as Greta Thunberg, who are raising awareness for climate change. A recent survey indicates that those efforts are working, as more and more Americans (especially young Americans) feel concerned about climate change.

A new CBS News poll found that 70% of Americans between 18 and 29 feel climate change is a crisis or a serious problem, while 58% of Americans over the age of 65 share those beliefs. Additionally, younger generations are more likely to feel like it's their personal responsibility to address climate change, as well as think that transitioning to 100% renewable energy is viable. Overall, 25% of Americans feel that climate change is a "crisis," and 35% feel it is a "serious problem." 10% of Americans said they think climate change is a minor problem, and 16% of Americans feel it is not a problem that worries them.

The poll found that concern for the environment isn't a partisan issue – or at least when it comes to younger generations. Two-thirds of Republicans under the age of 45 feel that addressing climate change is their duty, sentiments shared by only 38% of Republicans over the age of 45.

Keep Reading Show less
The Planet