Marriage, in the state of California, is defined as being between a man and a woman, per recent decisions by the voters and the state supreme court. A key argument in the making of that law was that marriage is a traditional institution with a long history that did not involve gay people, and adding them in now would only mess things up. A common retort is that, with a divorce rate of around 50 percent, straight couples are messing up traditional marriage themselves just fine.To help fix traditional marriage once and for all, John Marcotte has submitted his own ballot iniative to the state of California, proposing that divorce be totally outlawed. It’s hard to tell whether Marcotte is being serious or ironical about this (his picture is hard to read). Either way, it begs the question of whether people are willing to follow their beliefs to their logical, if unpleasant, conclusions. My experience in life has been that most of the time, people are not. What about you? Will you support the 2010 California Marriage Protection Act?Via Boing Boing
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

