The right pair of glasses can give the gift of sight. The wrong pair can leave you looking like a coke-bottled doofus.


Eyewear is both a medical necessity and a fashion statement, and the companies who dominate the industry have a hold on both factors. Many of their customers would rather pay top dollar—or go without glasses altogether—rather than get stuck with the wrong pair. But if you can’t afford the price, new glasses often aren’t an option.

Social enterprises Warby Parker and VisionSpring are finding innovative ways to bring glasses to people who can’t afford huge markups. VisionSpring, a nonprofit social enterprise, focuses on selling low-cost glasses to people earning between $1 and $4 per day. Warby Parker, a for-profit B-Corp, sells affordable eyewear in the domestic market while donating a pair of frames to VisionSpring for each pair it sells. “It didn’t make sense to us that a pair of glasses costs as much as an iPhone,” says Warby Parker co-founder Neil Blumenthal.

Seeing the Need

VisionSpring founder Dr. Jordan Kassalow, an ophthalmologist by trade, spent his early career offering eye care services to underserved populations. His first patient was a 7-year-old boy who was attending a school for the blind. When Kassalow examined the child, he realized he wasn’t actually blind, but needed a very powerful prescription. “Being the person who got to put those glasses on his face for the first time, and see him move from a blinded child to a sighted child right in front of me was a very powerful moment that really changed both of our lives,” he says.

Kassalow worked in India for a year and spent another eight fighting river blindness caused by an insect parasite in Africa. He became acutely aware that around 700 million people globally need glasses, 400 million of whom only require reading glasses. Receiving a prescription changed people’s lives dramatically. So in 2002, a time before benefit corporation and L3C designations, Kassalow founded VisionSpring, carving out new territory in the typical nonprofit structure. “I had no interest in starting a charity model,” he says, “because I felt strongly that in order to solve this problem in any significant way, you had to make the markets work… there weren’t enough donation dollars in the world that would make it scale.”

Instead, VisionSpring, working directly with manufacturers, circumvented eyewear companies that concentrate on the 10 percent of the populace in developing countries who own 90 percent of the wealth. “The vast majority of the 4 billion people in the world who earn less than four dollars a day is really the ignored market by the global multi-national optical industry,” Kassalow says.

By training 9,000 “vision entrepreneurs”—predominantly women in 13 developing countries—VisionSpring builds microenterprises within communities to sell low-cost glasses to customers who could not afford them otherwise. VisionSpring not only brings vision to those who need it, but demonstrates to the optical industry, “hey, there’s a market down here if you guys would pay attention to them,” Kassalow says.

Warby Parker co-founder Blumenthal got his start in the optical world at VisionSpring, running field operations for the organization. Among the lessons he learned (including how to source low-cost eyewear directly) was that “fashion matters no matter where you live in the world. You’d rather be blind than wear a used pair of 1970s cat eyes if you live in Bangladesh… you’ll get ridiculed by your friends and family,” he says. “There’s that same social construct, regardless of socio-economic status.”

So instead of giving away glasses in developing countries, VisionSpring’s model means designing, marketing and wooing value-conscious customers just as they would in the developed world. The process also taught Blumenthal that creating an affordable eyewear market can be a valuable service.

Fighting the Price Gouge

After working at VisionSpring for several years, Blumenthal wound up at the Wharton School of Business, where he met Warby Parker co-founders Jeffrey Raider, Andrew Hunt, and David Gilboa. The seed for the social venture was planted by their shared experience of feeling ripped off by the high prices in optical shops. Blumenthal understood the true cost of manufacturing corrective lenses; he’d seen high-end glasses coming off the same production lines as cheaper pairs. After some research, he says, “we saw that there were very few companies keeping prices artificially high.”

In the United States, he says, a single pair of glasses might cost upwards of $300 because a few companies dominate the optical industry and can inflate prices. Luxottica, for example, owns or licenses many major brands and owns 7,000 retail stores in North America—including Lens Crafters, Pearl Vision, Sears and Target Optical, and Sunglass Hut, as well as the vision insurance plan EyeMed. Each year, according to The Vision Council, Americans spend $8.4 billion on frames and lenses.

Warby Parker’s founders believed they could sidestep the optical monopoly if they manufactured and sold glasses directly to customers online, bringing the price of a $500 pair of glasses down to $95. In order to help the hundreds of millions without $95 to spare, Warby Parker adopted a buy one, give one model early on. For every pair sold, another is donated to VisionSpring.

“This is a good example of what we call reverse innovation,” Kassalow says. “[Neil] saw the disconnect in the price structure between what glasses cost in Asia and what customers have to pay in his own backyard. Being exposed to that knowledge, in an effort to help the poorest people in the world, he saw a business opportunity to help the average guy or gal here in the U.S. who is paying five times more for glasses than they need to.”

Business planning for Warby Parker took place for more than a year and a half while the founders finished up at Wharton. Selling glasses online brought particular hurdles—people care how they look in their glasses, so they want to try them on. The website offers a virtual try-on using facial recognition software, but Warby Parker also sends customers up to five pairs to try on at home and return with free shipping both ways.

Built on the life savings of its founders, Warby Parker launched in February 2010. In Blumenthal’s words, launch was “madness.” Warby Parker hit its first-year sales goals in three weeks. The company sold out of its top 15 styles in four weeks and accumulated a waitlist of about 20,000 people.

What An Alternate Market Means

How much can cheaper glasses change a person’s life? John Kelly, communications director for New York City’s health department and Warby Parker customer, has worn thick glasses—“save for a brief dalliance with contacts during those vain and uncertain adolescent years”—since he was 10 years old. Even for a guy with a steady job, the cost of glasses has always been a limiting factor. As a kid, he says, “I never wanted to get into a fistfight because I didn’t want my glasses to get broken. And the fact that there are people running around loose, not able to see, when it’s super-fixable, is maddening. Warby Parker is keeping it real on two fronts. They’re not rolling people and they’re helping out other folks who can’t afford to do it at any price. It’s a thing of beauty.”

Last year, Warby Parker donated more than 100,000 pairs of glasses to VisionSpring. Each of those pairs—plus another 213,000 funded through VisionSpring glasses sales and other philanthropic donations—was sold by vision entrepreneurs for around $4 each. That money feeds back into the enterprise, covering travel costs to neighboring villages and the entrepreneurs’ margins.

Those glasses can be a game-changer not just for the vision entrepreneurs, but for VisionSpring’s customers. For low-income individuals in India, access to simple reading glasses increases workers’ productivity by 34 percent; compared to those without specs, monthly income increases by 20 percent, according to a 2010 impact assessment by the University of Michigan’s William Davidson Institute. By that measure, VisionSpring’s $2.4 million budget in 2011 resulted in $103 million of economic impact for its customers.

“We thought that it was an inherent good if we could radically transform the optical industry, and transfer billions of dollars from these large multi-national corporations to normal people,” Blumenthal says.

Each Thursday, Sarah Stankorb examines the way social enterprise is changing business and creating positive impact.

Photo courtesy of Vision Spring

  • Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away
    Dogs have impressive observational powers.Photo credit: Canva

    Reddit user Girlfriendhatesmefor’s three-year-old pitbull, Otis, had recently become overprotective of his wife. So he asked the online community if they knew what might be wrong with the dog.

    “A week or two ago, my wife got some sort of stomach bug,” the Reddit user wrote under the subreddit /r/dogs. “She was really nauseous and ill for about a week. Otis is very in tune with her emotions (we once got in a fight and she was upset, I swear he was staring daggers at me lol) and during this time didn’t even want to leave her to go on walks. We thought it was adorable!”

    His wife soon felt better, butthe dog’s behavior didn’t change.

    pregnancy signs, dogs and pregnancy, pitbull behavior, pet intuition, dog overprotection, Reddit stories, viral Reddit, dog instincts, canine emotions, dog owner tips
    Otis knew before they did. Canva

    Girlfriendhatesmefor began to fear that Otis’ behavior may be an early sign of an aggression issue or an indication that the dog was hurt or sick.

    So he threw a question out to fellow Reddit users: “Has anyone else’s dog suddenly developed attachment/aggression issues? Any and all advice appreciated, even if it’s that we’re being paranoid!”

    The most popular response to his thread was by ZZBC.

    Any chance your wife is pregnant?

    ZZBC | Reddit

    The potential news hit Girlfriendhatesmefor like a ton of bricks. A few days later, Girlfriendhatesmefor posted an update and ZZBC was right!

    “The wifey is pregnant!” the father-to-be wrote. “Otis is still being overprotective but it all makes sense now! Thanks for all the advice and kind words! Sorry for the delayed reply, I didn’t check back until just now!”

    Redditors responded with similar experiences.

    Anecdotal I know but I swear my dog knew I was pregnant before I was. He was super clingy (more than normal) and was always resting his head on my belly.

    realityisworse | Reddit

    So why do dogs get overprotective when someone is pregnant?

    Jeff Werber, PhD, president and chief veterinarian of the Century Veterinary Group in Los Angeles, told Health.com that “dogs can also smell the hormonal changes going on in a woman’s body at that time.” He added the dog may “not understand that this new scent of your skin and breath is caused by a developing baby, but they will know that something is different with you—which might cause them to be more curious or attentive.”

    The big lesson here is to listen to your pets and to ask questions when their behavior abruptly changes. They may be trying to tell you something, and the news may be life-changing.

    This article originally appeared last year.

  • Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.

  • ,

    Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

    Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.

    While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.

    When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.

    Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.


Explore More Articles Stories

Articles

Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away

Articles

14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations

Articles

Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

Articles

11 hilarious posts describe the everyday struggles of being a woman