Art criticism is a tough racket. Critics are both loathed and lauded, as their personal interpretations of and appreciation for individual works and artists are then pored over and the reviews themselves criticized. In short, it’s all subjective. But there’s a new critic on the scene, publishing frank, matter-of-fact observations of abstract art, one of the world’s particularly debatable veins, via a Tumblr page called Novice Art Blogger. Yet something’s different about this critic whose name (and subsequent description of what the site will contain: “I’m experiencing Art for the first time, here are my responses”) admits honestly to an amateur grasp.
It’s a bot.
Created by Matthew Plummer-Fernandex, a British-Colombian artist and researcher who examines “sociocultural entanglements with technologies,” the Novice Art Blogger bot pulls abstract art images and content meta-data from the Tate’s online records which it then processes and attempts to decipher using deep learning algorithms. Finally, it spits out its terse analysis on the automated Tumblr page.
Its interpretation of “Death and the Conquistador” (1959) by Aubrey Williams: “A close up view of a pizza with one looking at it or it is depicting a pizza that is ready to bite of a large bowl. I’m reminded of a pizza, decorated to look like an angry bird.”
In an interview with Dazed, Plummer-Fernandez points to the bot’s interpretation of “Death and the Conquistador” as one of his favorites. It’s amusing, and, sure, there are pizza-like qualities to this piece, but it’s also certainly off-base when considering that Williams’s work is a violent portrayal of war.
Because it’s a bot, Plummer-Fernandez concedes that there’s “a childlike naivety that it gets away with” but that “the bot is simply articulating what it interprets; there is something very noble about that, that it is not passing judgment.”
“I think there is a value in having a machine describe art without the burden of prior art knowledge, art history, trends, and favoritism,” he continued. “It makes us reflect on whether art should be able to stand on its own and elicit unaffected experiences of art, or whether to read art we need that cultural context and formative background, or a mix of both.”
The project has prompted Plummer-Fernandez to contemplate how these sharing platforms and social networks impact human behavior and inclinations. “I’m tempted to unpack that as a topic, how technology for sharing is not just an act of technical engineering but also an act of social engineering, one that reconfigures us to share more even if we’re not experts nor inclined to do so.”
Critics, beware. (Artists, you may be next.) Automation’s coming for us all.
