Craig Shapiro was an early investor in Purple Rain: The Musical, an upcoming stage adaptation of the beloved 1984 Prince film. But this major opportunity wasn’t just about business—it’s the realization of a “lifelong dream” that began in childhood.

“I’m a massive fan,” he tells GOOD over Zoom from his home in Washington D.C. “I have two older cousins who were almost like big brothers to me—one is six years older than me, and one is nine years older. When I was a little kid, they were really into Prince. It was the first music I remember. I looked up to them: ‘Oh, my God, they are the coolest guys in the whole world!’ Whatever music they listened to, I said, ‘I’ve gotta listen to that.’ We used to go to the beach in the summer [growing up], and they brought a cassette tape of Purple Rain. I was like, “This is dripping with awesomeness.’”

Decades later, shortly after Prince died in 2016, Shapiro started hearing whispers about a possible Broadway adaptation. So the investor, a former GOOD Magazine collaborator and founder of the venture-capital firm Collaborative Fund, made the right connections and became involved in the musical—a buzzed-about project directed by Tony-nominee Lileana Blain-Cruz, with a book by Pulitzer Prize finalist Branden Jacobs-Jenkins, music supervision, arrangements, and orchestrations by Tony winner Jason Michael Webb, and choreography by Ebony Williams. Crucially for Prince fans, it also features two of The Artist’s core musical collaborators, drummer Bobby Z. and keyboardist Morris Hayes, as music advisors.

Before hitting Broadway, the production will take flight in the perfect location, running October 16-November 16 at the State Theatre in Prince’s native Minneapolis. “I hope that there’s going to be a lot of coverage when this thing hits Broadway,” Shapiro says, “but right now it’s still flying under the radar. It’s so Prince.”

He spoke to GOOD about the extent of his Prince fandom, how he got involved in the musical, and the unifying power of Purple Rain.

Shapiro’s Prince fandom

Can you talk about your personal connection to the film and Prince’s work? How did that lead you to getting involved with the musical?

[Years after discovering Purple Rain], I joined the [fan club] New Power Generation Music Club. I went to at least a dozen live performances at Hard Rock in L.A., the Fillmore in San Francisco, the Cap Center in D.C.—big venues, small venues. In fact, I saw him on his final tour, Piano & a Microphone, in Oakland. It was absolutely stunning, and he passed shortly after that. There were rumors about this potential Broadway show, and I was like, “I’m so far outside of that world and community, but if there’s a way I can get involved and be supportive, that would be a lifelong dream.” As a venture capitalist, I see how hard it is to start something new, to cobble together money early on. I thought this could be a way that my wife and I could support them, to potentially give them some initial fuel financially to get that production going.

I’m still kicking myself because Prince came through Atlanta on that tour, and I wasn’t able to make the show. His shows at the Fox Theatre were his last ever.

He was such an amazing talent, a musical genius, and the fact that he played every instrument. He had such a sense of humor, too. Even during that last show [I attended], he was just messing with the crowd. He was a human being, and we all have struggles and insecurities, but he showed up in a way that almost seemed like he was having fun with the world, despite his massive celebrity and success. He had kind of a wry smile. I’ll never forget that show—my wife and I went, and we still talk about it. He just oozed this amazing inner confidence that was such a wild mixture of masculinity, femininity—it was like somebody who is living their true self, which is so refreshing.

The musical’s “authenticity”

One unique element of the Purple Rain musical is having two longtime Prince bandmates, Bobby Z. and Morris Hayes, as advisers. It really gives the project a kind of pedigree, especially given how particular and meticulous Prince was about his music. Can you talk about their involvement—what exactly are they doing as advisers? Is it just quality control?

I don’t know the intricacies of their involvement, but I have to imagine it’s tied to the quality and the accuracy and authenticity of the production. I’m sure you know this, but Bobby Z. was Prince’s original drummer and [appeared in] the Purple Rain film. He literally lived the story with Prince, so I think having his direct involvement is—again, I can’t speak to the day to day—but it’s a key piece. For Morris, he spent more than 20 years as Prince’s keyboardist [primarily from 1992 to 2012] and music director, so he helped shape some of Prince’s biggest live moments. When you asked that question, it was spot on because [having them involved] kind of ensures that this isn’t going to run afoul of the movie and music. Between the two of them, they really knew Prince’s music best. Their fingerprints are all over his legacy. I think it’s rare for a Broadway show to have this kind of direct line back to the original artist, which is a nice tribute.

Another nice tribute is that the musical is being staged in Minneapolis before heading to Broadway. It seems rather obvious why you’d want to do that, but can you talk about that decision? It feels like a “best of both worlds” situation.

I couldn’t agree more. I wasn’t involved in the decision to do that, but I felt the exact same way when they shared that news. Obviously, Paisley Park is the birthplace of so much. For this creative genius to come from that city—it’s such a cool tribute to start there. It speaks, again, to the authenticity. This wasn’t a fly-by-night thing, like, “Let’s throw this together and see what happens.” It’s been a long time in the making, where they’ve taken careful consideration for how to get it right. When I saw Prince at The Fillmore in San Francisco, he played a show earlier in the night at one of the bigger stadiums. But the whisper on the street was that he’d show up at the Fillmore for a bit of an after-show. This kind of feels like that.

Purple healing rain

This is such a divided time in our country. Do you think there’s anything particularly relevant about the musical being staged now? Prince is that rare artist who appeals to a wide swath of people: classic-rock people, pop fans, funk lovers…Who better than Prince to speak to us?

Just speaking as a Prince fan and an interested party, I absolutely agree with you on multiple levels. During the pandemic, we were isolated, and now things have thawed out, and we’re going to see live music and sporting events again. But I was talking to someone who was recently at an L.A. Dodgers game. They said, “I was sitting in the cheap seats, and with the guy sitting next to me, there was zero doubt that we were on opposite ends of the political spectrum that is such a strong current in today’s culture, but we were both diehard Dodgers fans. There’s a home run, we’re standing up and high-fiving. I ordered a beer, and he passed it to me. We’re laughing and engaging.” I think Prince is a great example of [someone] who brings people together. There are so many people [for whom] Prince conjures up memories: “When I was at my high school homecoming, we slow-danced to ‘Purple Rain.’ That was my first love.” It kind of transcends a lot of these lines today that are super divisive. I think that’s a really interesting piece. I think the other is that Prince was actually quite a philanthropist and did so mostly anonymously—he gave money to organizations and to people, and a lot of it I didn’t learn about until after his passing. The more we can find events like a show or some type of entertainment to break down some of those divides, it’s a good thing. And Prince is unique in that sense because he ties back to nostalgia from when a lot of us were growing up.

Let’s end with this: What’s your favorite Prince song and album? I understand if you feel like you have to say Purple Rain and “Purple Rain.”

My favorite song is “The Beautiful Ones”—I just love that song so much. I can’t pick a favorite album. It’s hard not to go with Purple Rain, just because it’s what kicked things off, circling back to the beginning of our conversation. Just that indelible memory of being at the beach and my older cousins popping in that cassette—it really changed my life in a way. But I love Diamonds and Pearls, even a lot of the more recent music. It’s hard to pick a favorite album, but I would say, for non-music-related reasons, I’ve got to go with Purple Rain.

  • Woman documents her nephew’s late night culinary quests as the viral ‘Midnight Chef’
    Photo credit: @midnightchef_amir on InstagramAmir Jackson's late night cooking is going viral.
    ,

    Woman documents her nephew’s late night culinary quests as the viral ‘Midnight Chef’

    A 15-year-old cooking late night snacks is inspiring the Internet.

    One night in Apple Valley, California, Morgan Graham rose in the middle of the night. A smell had woken her up. It was pleasant, but at 11:28 p.m. she wasn’t expecting to smell delicious cooking. She went down into the kitchen to see her 15-year-old nephew, Amir Jackson, baking cookies.

    This was the first of several viral videos of Graham’s nephew cooking up a storm late at night. Jackson, who has been staying with his aunt during the summer, is taking advantage of her kitchen to whip up some sumptuous snacks.

    Birth of a Midnight Chef

    Nearly every night, Graham wakes up around midnight to the smell of cookies, cornbread, tacos, or whatever her nephew wants to prepare.

    “I don’t care,” said Graham in the initial video. “He’s very responsible. He’s not gonna burn the house down, so therefore, cook whatever you want.”

    Graham further explained in the video that Jackson looks at recipes daily. He also rummages through her pantry during the day to search for ingredients for his nightly cooking fest. 

    “In his world, he’s having the time of his life. In my world, I just want to stop waking up close to midnight to the smell of food,” Graham joked.

    Graham’s videos featuring her nephew have racked up millions of views on TikTok and Instagram. The commenters soon bestowed the nickname “Midnight Chef” upon Jackson, to general delight. In another video, Jackson explained he liked the peace and quiet of the night while preparing his dishes.

    “I was like, ‘Man, I could go for some cookies right now.’ I saw they had cookie dough, so I started just making them, just randomly,” Jackson told TODAY. “I was trying to make sure nobody was up. My thought process was just like, ‘Man, why not?’”

    Graham is encouraging her nephew to keep cooking even though it wakes her. In fact, Graham set up Jackson’s own Midnight Chef Instagram page for him to post his latest recipes.

    “I just want to experiment while I still got the chance to experiment. I’ll maybe like branch into different fields,” said Jackson. “Explore what I can do while I still got time to.”

    Why do we indulge in late night snacking?

    Jackson’s popularity has brought up a commonly asked question: Why do we crave food randomly in the middle of the night?

    Well, there’s actually a bit of science behind it. Turns out that late night snacking is a result of our circadian rhythm system. As part of our now-defunct survival mechanism, our ancestors would eat large meals at night to store energy in times of famine. This is also why most midnight snackers crave foods higher in fat, salt, and sugar compared to what they’d usually eat during the day. While there’s nothing inherently wrong with late night snacking, it could curb certain health goals if a person is trying to trim down.

    If you find yourself getting up in the middle of the night with a hankering for a snack, it may be worth taking a peek at Jackson’s videos. Who knows what kind of late night cooking it can inspire? Perhaps you’ll become a Midnight Chef yourself.

  • European Union enforces ban on destroying unsold fast-fashion clothing by major companies
    Photo credit: CanvaThe European Union hopes to reduce fast-fashion waste.

    A new rule adopted by the European Union is intended to reduce landfill waste while holding major clothing manufacturers accountable.

    Starting July 19, the EU prohibits large companies from destroying unsold clothing, accessories, and shoes under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR). The regulations will expand to cover medium-sized companies in 2030.

    Fast fashion has become a major environmental concern. As retailers rapidly cycle through trends, unsold clothing often ends up in landfills or is destroyed to make room for new inventory. Many garments are made from synthetic fibers that can release greenhouse gases as they break down and shed microplastics that may contaminate soil and waterways.

    What’s the ban’s purpose?

    The ban is intended to reduce the amount of unsold clothing that large manufacturers dispose of. According to the European Environment Agency, between 264,000 and 594,000 tonnes of unused textiles are destroyed across Europe each year.

    Instead of destroying unsold clothing, companies will need to find other ways to keep those products in use. That could mean selling excess inventory at a discount, donating it to charities or social enterprises, or preparing it for reuse through repair, refurbishment, or remanufacturing. When those options aren’t feasible, the materials can be recycled.

    While the regulation is primarily focused on reducing the fashion industry’s environmental impact, the EU also hopes it will strengthen the economy by encouraging more sustainable business practices. The ban incentivizes companies to design products that are more resource-efficient, durable, reusable, and easier to repair or recycle. In turn, consumers should benefit from higher-quality products that last longer and generate less waste.

    Companies may destroy unsold clothing and footwear only in limited circumstances, such as when the items are damaged, unsafe, counterfeit, infringe intellectual property rights, or have been rejected by charitable organizations. Businesses relying on these exemptions must provide supporting documentation, such as test results or other records, to justify the destruction. Even then, they must follow the EU’s waste hierarchy, which prioritizes reuse and recycling over disposal. Companies are also required to publish annual reports detailing the unsold products they have discarded.

    National authorities will enforce the ban and may impose fines on companies that violate its requirements, including failing to maintain records for at least five years to support inspections. To help reduce the administrative burden, businesses may use existing customs and logistics codes when reporting the products they discard.

    Why recycling isn’t enough

    Recycling clothing can be a complicated and labor-intensive process. It often involves separating fabrics, dyes, synthetic fibers, and natural textile materials before they can be reused. That’s not to say it isn’t worthwhile. Instead of ending up in a landfill, recycled textiles can be turned into new clothing, home insulation, carpet padding, and other products.

    Still, recycling isn’t a cure-all. The EU hopes the new ban will encourage companies to keep usable clothing in circulation for as long as possible through resale, donation, reuse, or refurbishment before recycling becomes necessary. In doing so, the regulation aims to create a more circular economy rather than allowing piles of unused clothing to continue growing.

    This movement hopes to encourage clothing manufacturers to produce higher-quality products and reshape the industry as a whole. Making clothing from higher-grade materials with durable stitching that’s easier to repair can help reduce waste. While critics argue that doing so could reduce the number of garments sold each year, many say better-made clothing is worth the higher price—especially if consumers end up buying fewer replacement items over time.

    What can you do with old clothing?

    There are plenty of things you can do with old clothing around your home. If an item is too damaged to donate, its fabric can be repurposed for crafts or used as cleaning rags. And if you’re handy with a needle, there are countless ways to upcycle old clothes into new outfits, accessories, or other useful items with a little inspiration from the Internet.

    Giant corporations and everyday people alike can do their best to make the most of the materials they have, helping save money and reduce waste.

  • European Broadcasting Union offers guide to reduce sexualizing camera angles of Olympic women athletes
    Photo credit: CanvaA new guide has been introduced on how to respectfully broadcast woman athletes.

    Being an athlete is tough, especially if you’re an Olympian. They sacrifice their time and bodies in order to achieve peak physical condition. There is also the mental pressure to compete against the best. The last thing they should worry about is being objectified and sexualized online. 

    With this in mind, the European Broadcasting Union wants to help. They offered a booklet to broadcasters titled Raising the Bar: Guidelines for respectful media coverage in women’s athletics. The 23-page guide shows how camera placement choices and editing could potentially compromise an athlete. It also offers broadcasters guidelines for how to set up camera shots and show slow-motion replays that won’t sexualize or present athletes in undignified poses. 

    athletes, infographic, olympians, guide
    Screenshot

    Focusing on the sport, reducing harassment

    These guidelines come as multiple stories about women athletes being harassed online have surfaced. Many misogynistic posts about athletes have come from slow motion footage focused on certain parts of the athlete’s body. 

    “The sexualization of women athletes through selective camera angles and editing choices continues to be a significant concern across many sports broadcasts,” wrote Glen Killane, executive director of EBU Sport in the booklet. “Lingering shots on bodies, low-angle cameras that capture revealing views, and excessive slow-motion replays that serve no technical or storytelling purpose are among the issues observed in the media coverage of women’s athletics competitions today.”

    These new broadcast guidelines and suggestions are backed by Serbian long jumper Ivana Španović, British Olympic pole vaulter Holly Bradshaw, and Croatian high jumper Blanka Vlašić. Vlašić has spoken out regarding the equal visibility of women’s sports. Bradshaw has spoken out against the discomfort and sexualization of Olympic women athletes due to their tight-fitting uniforms.

    “I first-hand have received social media abuse and witnessed inappropriate videos online of myself and colleagues when slow motion content of us competing is captured,” wrote Bradshaw in the guide. “Athletes want to enjoy themselves doing the sport they love without feeling uncomfortable or anxious about the footage being shown live. Many athletes, myself included, have been in competitive scenarios where they are more focused on the cameras instead of their own performance.”

    What the guide provides

    The guide provides visual aids for broadcasters along with insights from the athletes to explain why certain shots would be preferred. Broadcasters are requested to avoid tight shots from the back of athletes. They’re also asked to avoid low camera angles from underneath. They recommend shots above the pelvis or ones that don’t linger onto commonly sexualized areas of the body. They recommend wider shots so the audience can see the technical ability being displayed by the athlete. Overall, the point is to focus on the athletic performance rather than close-ups of the athlete.

    Currently, there is no enforcement of these guidelines or penalties if a sports broadcast doesn’t adhere to them. However, there is value in knowing which broadcasts will focus on the athletic contests rather than an athlete’s appearance. This will help the competitors focus on how they do rather than how they look when the cameras are on.

Explore More Culture Stories

Fashion

European Union enforces ban on destroying unsold fast-fashion clothing by major companies

Film & TV

European Broadcasting Union offers guide to reduce sexualizing camera angles of Olympic women athletes

Culture

The summer concert state rankings: Which states pack more festivals, shows, and tours in 2026

Internet

The church fathers of early Christianity are showing their swag – on TikTok