Good climate journalism is, unfortunately, hard to find. Which is why I’m pretty excited to follow the new Earth Journalism Awards competition (which we previously mentioned here). Organized by the Internews Network, the EJAs-“Honoring the world’s best climate change reporting”-have whittled down over 450 pieces of climate-related reporting to 15 finalists. These run quite a range of subject matter (not to mention place and medium of publication), including stories on carbon capture and sequestration for Scientific American, a Reuters piece on loopholes and cracks in the emerging carbon markets, a five-part ClimateWire series on climate-induced migration from Bangladesh (which got my vote), and even a Youtube rap video on climate impacts in Kenya. Also in the finals is Bill Wheeler’s recent GOOD piece on the water crisis in India and Pakistan.It’s well worth giving all the finalists a good look. Too few media outlets are putting the energy and resources into good, thorough coverage of climate change’s impacts and solutions, with all the nuance and detail that the subject really demands. It’s encouraging and exciting to see that it’s out there, and hopefully these awards can help drum up editorial interest for more such deep, searching, and creative reporting.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

