Exploring the sci-fi (and simply sci) roots of the word.

Robots are in the air, and I don’t just mean flying robots like the self-assembling, Borg-like Distributed Flight Array: The wonderful sci-fi cartoon Futurama, featuring the world’s foremost alcoholic robot, Bender, just returned from cancellation; the recent quarterly update to the Oxford English Dictionary offered a huge update of “robot” and robo-related words; and I’ve been thoroughly enjoying my visits to Robot City Workshop, a nothing-but-robots store in my north Chicago neighborhood.


With real robots doing everything from surgery to roller skating, I know that affordable robot butlers are just around the corner—making it a great time for an extended look at “robot,” a word that already performs so many jobs for us in sci-fi and science.

“Robot” has a refreshingly clear-cut origin. As Oxford English Dictionary Chief Editor John Simpson writes, “In 1920 the Czech writer Karel ?apek published his play R.U.R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots)—in Czech, but with a strange new word (in English) in the title. ?apek said that the word was suggested to him by his brother Josef (from Czech robota ‘forced labour, drudgery’).” ?apek’s play featured artificial creatures that were biological rather than mechanical, created to do crappy jobs. That play made its way to New York in 1922, and the robot invasion of English was underway.

The 1920s saw the word breed like bunny-bots. As early as 1923, it was being used for cold, emotionless people, a sense Tim Siedell revisited recently: “A remote sub made the Gulf leak worse. Stories appear about Al Gore’s sex life. All in all, a pretty bad week for robots.” The 1920s also saw the first uses of “robot clerk,” “robot plane,” “robot station,” “robot army,” “robotesque,” and “robotian,” and by the end of the decade, automatic street lights were also called “robots.”

One of the more violent meanings didn’t emerge till World War II: the “robot bomb” of the Germans, which was self-propelled and also called a “doodle bug,” “robot airplane,” and “robomb.” In the mid-1980s, software robots popped up, showing the tendency of “robot” to be used much like “smart” for any program or device that has some autonomy.

Though science fiction (especially in the movies) has dominated our collective sense of robot-itude, robots are far from a fantasy these days. You don’t have to peruse magazines like New Scientist or Robot for long to see examples of real robots that can fly, cook, bow, dance, shake hands, climb rocks, work as a team, and assist geriatric patients. The prolific science of robotics is intriguing for another reason. As Oxford Dictionary of Science Fiction Editor Jeff Prucher notes, robotics is “one of the only actual sciences to have been first named in a science fiction story”—specifically Isaac Asimov’s 1941 story “Liar.” The OED’s first non-sci-fi use isn’t till 1968: “Significant technological advances in the field of ‘robotics’—the use of robots in the field of industrial automation—were announced today.” Asimov’s short stories also feature the first uses of “robotic,” “robotical,” “roboticist,” and “robotics,” plus the invention of “The Three Laws of Robotics,” which appeared as “the three fundamental rules of Robotics” back in 1942.

Both halves of “robot” have been prolific word-generators. Robo-words tend to designate actual robots or robot-like non-bots, as in a Matt Taibbi reference to Mitt Romney as a “Mormon glambot.” Political observers and annoyed phone answerers know the “robocall”—those obnoxious, automated messages. Then there’s Robocop, a 1987 movie, but a word 30 years older and used by Harlan Ellison: “Bergman stopped at the door, as the robocop rolled up, and its tentacles slammed out at him.”

Meanwhile, “bot” has been shorthand for “robot” since at least 1969. From the OED: “When they got my ship the only part of me that the ‘bots were able to get into cold-sleep was my head, shoulders and a part of my spine.” The sense of “bot” as a computer program that searches for info is much newer, first appearing in a 1990 usenet post titled “Bot-haters Unite!” “Bot” is also a prolific suffix: the OED has examples of Santa-bot, snakebot, and J.Lo-bot, plus a full entry on “fembot,” probably the most successful word of this type, no doubt because of the fearsome female robots that have filled Battlestar Galactica, Austin Powers, and male fantasies.

Whether in the real world, the bizarre worlds of sci-fi, or the English language, you just can’t stop robots. Even the universal desire for a robot butler may soon be sated: meet Baxter the Butler Bot and his faithful sidekick, RoboFridge.

Illustration by Will Etling.

  • Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away
    Dogs have impressive observational powers.Photo credit: Canva

    Reddit user Girlfriendhatesmefor’s three-year-old pitbull, Otis, had recently become overprotective of his wife. So he asked the online community if they knew what might be wrong with the dog.

    “A week or two ago, my wife got some sort of stomach bug,” the Reddit user wrote under the subreddit /r/dogs. “She was really nauseous and ill for about a week. Otis is very in tune with her emotions (we once got in a fight and she was upset, I swear he was staring daggers at me lol) and during this time didn’t even want to leave her to go on walks. We thought it was adorable!”

    His wife soon felt better, butthe dog’s behavior didn’t change.

    pregnancy signs, dogs and pregnancy, pitbull behavior, pet intuition, dog overprotection, Reddit stories, viral Reddit, dog instincts, canine emotions, dog owner tips
    Otis knew before they did. Canva

    Girlfriendhatesmefor began to fear that Otis’ behavior may be an early sign of an aggression issue or an indication that the dog was hurt or sick.

    So he threw a question out to fellow Reddit users: “Has anyone else’s dog suddenly developed attachment/aggression issues? Any and all advice appreciated, even if it’s that we’re being paranoid!”

    The most popular response to his thread was by ZZBC.

    Any chance your wife is pregnant?

    ZZBC | Reddit

    The potential news hit Girlfriendhatesmefor like a ton of bricks. A few days later, Girlfriendhatesmefor posted an update and ZZBC was right!

    “The wifey is pregnant!” the father-to-be wrote. “Otis is still being overprotective but it all makes sense now! Thanks for all the advice and kind words! Sorry for the delayed reply, I didn’t check back until just now!”

    Redditors responded with similar experiences.

    Anecdotal I know but I swear my dog knew I was pregnant before I was. He was super clingy (more than normal) and was always resting his head on my belly.

    realityisworse | Reddit

    So why do dogs get overprotective when someone is pregnant?

    Jeff Werber, PhD, president and chief veterinarian of the Century Veterinary Group in Los Angeles, told Health.com that “dogs can also smell the hormonal changes going on in a woman’s body at that time.” He added the dog may “not understand that this new scent of your skin and breath is caused by a developing baby, but they will know that something is different with you—which might cause them to be more curious or attentive.”

    The big lesson here is to listen to your pets and to ask questions when their behavior abruptly changes. They may be trying to tell you something, and the news may be life-changing.

    This article originally appeared last year.

  • Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.

  • ,

    Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

    Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.

    While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.

    When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.

    Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.


Explore More Articles Stories

Articles

Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away

Articles

14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations

Articles

Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

Articles

11 hilarious posts describe the everyday struggles of being a woman