The Omidyar Network, eBay founder Pierre Omidyar’s brain child, is the world’s most effective philanthropy. It and fellow venture-philanthropy outfit The Skoll Foundation are numbers one and two, respectively, on Barron’s list of the Top 25 most effective givers. The rankings eschew traditional philanthropic measurements (namely, who cuts the biggest check), and instead focus on who gets the best results. From Barron‘s:Some of the findings will surprise you. Who would imagine, for instance, that a targeted effort to alleviate the worst poverty in a single country, Ethiopia, could end up having a greater impact than the massive $34 billion Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and its myriad education and health programs worldwide? By our standards, the Ethiopian initiative, launched by Donna and Philip Berber, wins by dint of immediacy.Gates, if you’re wondering, sits at number seven on the list (though Barron’s notes that it could easily move to number one if a few of its initiatives start to bear fruit). The list is pretty compelling, striking a nice balance between famous and not-so-famous entries-all of which are improving our world. Read all 25 here.Via The Daily Beast.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

