Remember just last week when everyone was so upset about the TSA pat downs? Our attention spans being what they are (and Wikileaks being so intriguing), that story is no more, though people continue to fly and continue to get their testicles grazed by the TSA. Now we can make jokes about it. Twitter user Theramina tweeted this picture today (though she says its creator is anonymous). It’s a brilliant distillation of one facet of the argument against the TSA’s screening procedures. The problem for the TSA is that they can’t prove their counter-argument: that these pat-downs are making us safer. Obviously, finding a terrorist with a bomb while using a back-scatter device or doing a pat down would bolster their case. But part of the idea is that terrorists, knowing that the TSA will touch their balls, are forced to spend time and money thinking of new ways to blow up planes. And there is no way for the TSA to prove that is working. So, they continue to toil away while we mock them.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

