Here, from the Tax Foundation, is a helpful chart that shows how the first decade of health care reform is paid for. It’s interesting to note that, while many opponents of reform cast it as an expansion of government entitlement programs, the biggest source of funding is reductions in medicare, an expensive entitlement program.Also, you may have heard people debating whether the bill costs money or saves it over the long run. This chart shows that the first decade of the bill reduces the deficit by a few billion dollars (the chart adds to $1.08 trillion while the bill only costs $938 billion). When supporters talk about the bill reducing the deficit by “over a trillion dollars” they’re looking at two decades. And critics of the bill rightly note that a lot of the cost savings that are scheduled to take effect in 2019 are going to be hard to follow through on politically when the time comes, so that reduction isn’t guaranteed by any means. When you imagine taking out some of the sources of funding that are least likely to happen in 2019, the bill actually raises the deficit.At the end of the day, whether the bill costs the country money or saves it depends on tough decisions a future congress will face. On the cable news shows, Democrats and Republicans consistently talk past each other on that point.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

