The United Nations military commander, General Martin Agwai, says that although the area will likely continue to see things like banditry and skirmishes of local violence, the “real war” between rebels in Darfur and the Sudanese government is “over.” According to the BBC, Agwai says that as rebel groups have split so thoroughly into factions, the fighting is now significantly less serious. He’s set to leave his post, this week, to be succeeded by Lieutenant General Patrick Nyamvumba.The BBC piece doesn’t exactly inspire confidence that the situation has been resolved, and some analysts think Agwai’s done a tremendous disservice to the millions of refugees-and hundreds of thousands of families of war-dead-by describing the war as over. I don’t want to get all “remember when that one guy said ‘Mission Accomplished’ when in fact the mission in question wasn’t even close to accomplished,” but, um, remember when that one guy said Mission Accomplished when in fact the mission in question wasn’t even close to accomplished?For more, check out Wikipedia’s surprisingly decent timeline of the Darfur conflict, or our out-of-date but nonetheless poignant info-comic exploration, Tell Me More.Photo (cc) of Darfur refugees by Flickr user hdptcar.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

