To win the 21st Century’s version of the Space Race, we need to start learning (and stop underfunding) science.

As our nation celebrated the 40th anniversary of the Apollo moon landing last week, one sad truth went barely mentioned: America has lost its scientific lead. Indeed, if we were running the Space Race on today’s scientific landscape, the United States would be stuck on the launch pad. Over the past quarter century, federal funding in the physical sciences has dropped by nearly half as a portion of our gross domestic product. Our students trail their peers in most developed countries-and some developing countries-in math and science. Given our chronic national scientific illiteracy, and without the educational resources to make us global leaders again, our prospects in the great Clean Energy Race of the next few decades aren’t all that good.”We know that our country is better than this,” President Obama told the National Academy of Sciences Annual Meeting a couple months back. He continued:A half century ago, this nation made a commitment to lead the world in scientific and technological innovation; to invest in education, in research, in engineering; to set a goal of reaching space and engaging every citizen in that historic mission. That was the high water mark of America’s investment in research and development. And since then our investments have steadily declined as a share of our national income. As a result, other countries are now beginning to pull ahead in the pursuit of this generation’s great discoveries.? I believe it is not in our character, the American character, to follow. It’s our character to lead. And it is time for us to lead once again.Scientific leadership must begin with science education. Yet according to a 2007 report (pdf) by the joint National Academies, “In South Korea, 38 percent of all undergraduates receive their degrees in natural science or engineering. In France, the figure is 47 percent, in China, 50 percent, and in Singapore 67 percent. In the United States, the corresponding figure is 15 percent.” The rest of the world is gearing up to clean our clock on clean energy. It’s crucial that we find a way to inspire, educate, and train young Americans in the science and engineering disciplines to tackle these “grand challenges of this century.”During his speech, the President announced a new program, RE-ENERGYSE (REgaining our ENERGY Science and Engineering Edge), that would start our climb back to global scientific leadership, particularly on the clean energy front. He asked for $115 million in the Department of Energy’s 2010 budget to educate future leaders in energy science and technology. ($80 million would go to higher education for curriculum development, fellowships, post-doc field traineeships and the like; the other $35 million would be devoted to technical training at community colleges and for K-12 science and energy literacy.)According to the DOE’s description (pdf), the program would ready between 5,000 and 8,500 highly educated scientists, engineers, and other professionals to enter the clean energy field by 2015, and up to 10,000 to 17,000 professionals by 2020. The technical training subprogram would develop between 200 and 300 community colleges and other training programs “to equip thousands of technically skilled workers for clean energy jobs.”Sounds like a good investment. Except the House Appropriations Committee cut funding for RE-ENERGYSE to a mere $7 million and the version to rise from the Senate’s committee sliced its funding entirely. Jesse Jenkins and Teryn Norris at the Breakthrough Institute-who proposed a similar, if much more ambitious, National Energy Education Act last summer-partnered with the Association of American Universities and rounded up a group of more than 100 schools, student groups, and nonprofit organizations to jointly submit a letter (pdf) to all senators urging full support of the President’s RE-ENERGYSE proposal. Over the phone, Jenkins stressed the urgency-the Energy and Water Appropriations budget will be voted for on the Senate floor as soon as this week.As Obama told the National Academy in April, “The nation that leads the world in 21st century clean energy will be the nation that leads in the 21st century global economy… [RE-ENERGYSE] will prepare a generation of Americans to meet this generational challenge.” RE-ENERGYSE is a vital first step for regaining our scientific edge and taking the lead in the clean energy race. It should be fully funded.NOW WHAT? Check out the Breakthrough Institute’s press release and call you Senator immediately, telling them to “meet the full budget request for the RE-ENERGYSE program.”

  • Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away
    Dogs have impressive observational powers.Photo credit: Canva

    Reddit user Girlfriendhatesmefor’s three-year-old pitbull, Otis, had recently become overprotective of his wife. So he asked the online community if they knew what might be wrong with the dog.

    “A week or two ago, my wife got some sort of stomach bug,” the Reddit user wrote under the subreddit /r/dogs. “She was really nauseous and ill for about a week. Otis is very in tune with her emotions (we once got in a fight and she was upset, I swear he was staring daggers at me lol) and during this time didn’t even want to leave her to go on walks. We thought it was adorable!”

    His wife soon felt better, butthe dog’s behavior didn’t change.

    pregnancy signs, dogs and pregnancy, pitbull behavior, pet intuition, dog overprotection, Reddit stories, viral Reddit, dog instincts, canine emotions, dog owner tips
    Otis knew before they did. Canva

    Girlfriendhatesmefor began to fear that Otis’ behavior may be an early sign of an aggression issue or an indication that the dog was hurt or sick.

    So he threw a question out to fellow Reddit users: “Has anyone else’s dog suddenly developed attachment/aggression issues? Any and all advice appreciated, even if it’s that we’re being paranoid!”

    The most popular response to his thread was by ZZBC.

    Any chance your wife is pregnant?

    ZZBC | Reddit

    The potential news hit Girlfriendhatesmefor like a ton of bricks. A few days later, Girlfriendhatesmefor posted an update and ZZBC was right!

    “The wifey is pregnant!” the father-to-be wrote. “Otis is still being overprotective but it all makes sense now! Thanks for all the advice and kind words! Sorry for the delayed reply, I didn’t check back until just now!”

    Redditors responded with similar experiences.

    Anecdotal I know but I swear my dog knew I was pregnant before I was. He was super clingy (more than normal) and was always resting his head on my belly.

    realityisworse | Reddit

    So why do dogs get overprotective when someone is pregnant?

    Jeff Werber, PhD, president and chief veterinarian of the Century Veterinary Group in Los Angeles, told Health.com that “dogs can also smell the hormonal changes going on in a woman’s body at that time.” He added the dog may “not understand that this new scent of your skin and breath is caused by a developing baby, but they will know that something is different with you—which might cause them to be more curious or attentive.”

    The big lesson here is to listen to your pets and to ask questions when their behavior abruptly changes. They may be trying to tell you something, and the news may be life-changing.

    This article originally appeared last year.

  • Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.

  • ,

    Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

    Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.

    While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.

    When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.

    Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.


Explore More Articles Stories

Articles

Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away

Articles

14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations

Articles

Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

Articles

11 hilarious posts describe the everyday struggles of being a woman