Articles

The World’s Banks and the Next Billion

This author, screenwriter, Jeopardy! contestant and serial microlender has personally made over 9,300 $25 loans that resulted in almost a quarter million bucks.

Bob Harris wears many hats. An author of The International Bank of Bob, screenwriter, frequent Jeopardy! contestant and serial microlender—he’s personally made over 9,300 loans by recycling his initial $20,000 nearly 12 times on the microfinance platform Kiva resulting in almost a quarter million bucks in $25 loans—talks to GOOD about how a working class American became a bank for the rest of the world, and what cotton candy and generosity have in common.

Tell me about yourself. What were you doing before you started lending on Kiva?

I’ve never been able to thumbnail my career! I’ve gotten to write for CSI and Bones. I ran the writer’s room on a Mexican action show and had to learn Spanish to do it. I had a syndicated radio segment for several years. Between all of that, I was able to supplement my income for years by being invited back to Jeopardy! a lot, which was really fun. I’ve been on the show 14 times.

I’ve had this really jack-of-all-trades career, and in 2008, I lucked into a job working for Forbes Traveler—the luxury travel imprint that Forbes magazine was trying to create—as a luxury travel reviewer which was ridiculous because I grew up working class. My grandfather was a coal miner, my dad worked in a factory for General Motors, and when I grew up you kept track of every dollar—that was just the way we lived. Suddenly I’m flying around the world and staying in expensive hotels!

In the course of that, I was in lots of places where the difference between rich and poor is way more visible than it is here in the United States.

[quote position="full" is_quote="true"]What was astonishing is how absolutely identical the interactions were everywhere I went.[/quote]

Was there an a-ha moment for your lending and eventually the book idea?

The real epiphany was on Sheikh Zayed Road in Dubai one particular night outside of the Fairmont Hotel. There were these four guys sitting on the ground at about 11 o'clock at night looking completely wilted, and it looked like they had missed their ride back to the camp where they live. They were just sitting there like they were going to pass the night that way. Meanwhile, upstairs in my room at the Fairmont I was welcomed with a mountain of food on the bed: an enormous platter of fresh fruit and other snacks, which was more food than I was ever going to eat. So I went upstairs, shoved as much of the food as I could in my backpack, went downstairs again and approached the guys.

It was like crossing a threshold. When we choose to help a stranger, there is that moment of social awkwardness of, I don’t even know how to do this; Is this even safe? Is this ok? What will happen? That boundary is often, I think, the thing that inhibits us from doing something good that our heart wants us to do.

One of them looked up and smiled at me. I sat down, we had no language in common to speak of, but they got what I was doing and it was totally cool. There was no sense of indebtedness or whatever. We sat there for about 40 minutes just chowing down together and it was a very pleasant time. Afterward, I just went back up to my room and wished I knew what to do because there are thousands and thousands of people working in these conditions here, and millions around the world, and these guys wouldn’t even be here if the local economy had been better in India where they were from.

[quote position="full" is_quote="true"]On a deep level everyone’s just trying to make a better life for their kids.[/quote]

I proceeded to feel fairly hopeless about things for about two months until I was in Beijing in Tiananmen Square. People were just at that time starting to upload their photos to the Internet and the whole Facebook thing was starting. And I thought it would be so cool if there was a website where people could upload their work situation, or upload their idea, and other people could help.

It dawned on me a few months earlier I had heard Premal Shah of Kiva give a talk about microfinance in San Francisco. I’d even had the thought of writing a magazine article, or maybe I would make some loans and follow it, because microfinance had won the Nobel Peace Prize. And very quickly the wheels started turning in my head and I said, Okay, I’ll take all the Forbes travel money and I’ll just put it in all these microloans. If they repay, then great—if not, it’ll be like spiritual money laundering. I can live with that.

Then I mentioned it to my literary agent and she said, Oh, that’s a book. And that began nearly four years of going back and forth between the U.S. and five continents visiting clients in the entire Kiva ecosystem in Peru, Lebanon, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, Nepal and so forth.

How’d you come up with the title for the book?

It started in 2009 as a joke. The idea that one person could act like an international development lender just sounded amusing. But pretty soon I found that I was re-lending my funds, over and over, like taking repayments from a fisherman in Bangladesh and routing them to support a loan to a farmer in Peru. So conceptually the joke turned out to be pretty accurate.

I tried out the phrase on the message board of the “Friends of Bob Harris” lending team at Kiva, and a couple of people started calling themselves “the international bank of” using their own name, and I really liked that. It was exactly the feeling I wanted to encourage.

[quote position="full" is_quote="true"][Kiva has] moved the needle on lender due diligence and trying to quantify social impact.[/quote]

How did you decide where to spread your original $20,000 on Kiva before you started following the money? Did you have a formula or criteria for yourself?

At first, it was just about which lenders’ stories really resonated for me. I think the third loan I ever made was to a guy in Paraguay who was borrowing to buy strips of leather so that he could soak them in citronella and make mosquito-repellent bracelets that local kids could wear to avoid getting dengue fever. What a simple, obvious, necessary thing! Of course I lent to him. That affected me partly because I’d had dengue myself. If you go to Kiva, you’ll find a story that you will connect with.

So tell me about your journey and the making of your book.

It was a full-on personal study of taking a bunch of my own money, investing through the Kiva platform, and then following it literally all the way to the client. Through Kiva’s ecosystem, I was able to meet actual clients and field partners, and visit microfinance institutions and loan offices. And despite the rhetoric that we hear so commonly in a nation that is now driven by fear, I was welcomed like an old friend everywhere I went.

It was an amazing experience. I never told any of the clients that I was a lender. What I found was, Yes, Kiva works and it really does help people. Some businesses failthat’s lifebut it does create opportunity.

It becomes this exercise in meeting the world. I’m shaking its hand. What was astonishing is how absolutely identical the interactions were everywhere I went—except for the cosmetic details of language, clothing, food, ritual. On a deep level everyone’s just trying to make a better life for their kids.

The response was universal—we are one.

Bob Harris with Kiva borrowers in the Philippines

Did anyone make a lasting impression?

The most important interaction I had was with a guy in Lebanon. We were driving back from visiting a client, and we’re going down this shoreline highway, and he tells me his story about having his home and business destroyed in a war that he had nothing personally to do with. I asked him how he coped with that and he turned to me and said, You love more, you win, which is what I wrote about in a previous GOOD article. It didn’t come out of some Berkley seminar or a yoga class or in a philosophy book; it was something he could improvise on the fly while his life was falling apart. And if he has the strength to do that, then I do too; you do too, and everyone who reads this does.

How about yourself--did you leave an impression on anyone?

You know how cotton candy congeals around the stick? It will just sit in the drum until somebody puts a stick in there and then it will all coalesce and then you can pull it all out and get a big lump? Generosity is a little bit like that. And what people are often lacking is that stick. I accidentally made a stick and then boom! Thousands of people showed up and millions of dollars flew out of the door!

Has there been any change in the types of loans you fund today compared to 6 years ago?

Oh, sure. Now that I’ve been in the field, I actually know the people at a bunch of Kiva partners. I see loans administered by Al Majmoua in Beirut or Urwego in Rwanda, for example. These aren’t faraway places to me anymore. I have friends now in those offices; people I’ve come to really admire. It’s like supporting the work of friends now.

What do you think is the single most important technology to impact the microfinance world?

I’ll start by saying I think the Kiva platform itself has had a larger impact than they’re often given credit for. When Premal Shah, Matt Flannery and Jessica Jackley were first talking about it more than a decade ago, crowdfunding wasn’t even a thing. As far as I can tell, in large part, Kiva seems to have invented it. They’ve also moved the needle on lender due diligence and in trying to quantify social impact. They’ve inspired similar platforms like Babyloan in Europe and Rang De in India.

Worldwide, the combination of mobile banking and affordable smartphone handsets has been pretty huge and the potential is still enormous. A farmer in a rural area, for example, can now check market prices for his crop, repay loans, borrow to buy fertilizer or equipment, transfer profits to family elsewhere… you name it. And lending institutions can administer loans, offer consultation, and so on at a much lower cost, too. This has been underway for years, but as data speeds increase, I bet we’ll see innovations soon that I can’t even dream of now.

[quote position="full" is_quote="true"]I’m grateful that I can use Kiva to share my good fortune all over the world.[/quote]

We touched a little bit on the idea that the details around microfinance will change because of how fast technology is changing. As the "next billion" people come online, in your opinion, how do you see access to opportunity and financial security could change?

Lots of interesting things are happening. Solar power is getting cost-effective enough that village-sized units can now bring clean electricity to places that have never been on the grid. (Kiva finances some larger loans for programs like this, by the way.) If this becomes ubiquitous, we’ll have families making a leap from the 19th to the 21st century, at least in terms of connectivity.

Meanwhile, Kiva’s now doing something truly amazing: their loans to U.S. clients are on a peer-to-peer basis, without a lending institution in the middle, and at zero interest to the client. The loans are backed by a network of trustees and people in the borrower’s own personal networks, who basically vouch for people. The repayment rate is a little lower than a loan through an institution right now, but they’re working on the model.

Let’s imagine all three things sort of combining and scaling: rural areas coming online and empowered with mobile banking and peer-to-peer lending. Imagine a craftsperson in India needs to borrow to buy seasonal supplies—and suddenly they can do so easily and quickly, financed by a community of trusted lenders and borrowers, creating more time for them to work productively, develop skills, or focus on their kids. What does the world look like a generation later? Obviously, there are massive political hurdles. But it’s interesting to think about.

Are there any other most memorable moments from your travels you'd like to share?

On one of my first trips, to Bosnia, I met the first clients whose loans I’d personally invested in. I actually recognized some of them from photos on the Kiva website, which felt like having jumped through my computer screen to the other side of the world. While I was there, the local Kiva partner was run by Bosnian Muslims, but some of the clients I met were Croatian Catholics—despite the fact that in living memory, these groups had been at war. It was a real lesson in how doing small bits of business with each other helps communities knit together.

One of my last client visits was to a daycare center in Chicago. I didn’t realize until I got there that it was literally walking distance from where I’d lived in my early 20s, when I was so broke that I lived in a YMCA for several months. I saved every spare dollar to pay for improv classes and learn to communicate and perform and maybe someday make a better life. I remember being afraid I’d be stuck there forever. Twenty-five years later, somehow I’d been around the world several times and was now helping somebody else with a big dream and a willingness to chase it.

I feel grateful for the life I’ve had every time I think of that moment. And I’m grateful that I can use Kiva to share my good fortune all over the world.

This article is part of our series celebrating 10 years of collaboration between PayPal and Kiva. Help kick off the next decade of impact. Make a loan today at Kiva.org and the first 10,000 lenders through 10/10/16 will receive a $25 Kiva credit, provided by PayPal, to lend again. Terms and conditions apply.

Articles

14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations

These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.

Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.



This article originally appeared on December 14, 2016.

Articles

Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.

AP Photo/Jessica Hill/The Conversation

Shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.

When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.

Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.

In the United States, where some significant portion of the public believes that the government is out to take their guns, the idea that a mass shooting was orchestrated by the government in an attempt to make guns look bad may be appealing both psychologically and ideologically.

Our studies of mass shootings and conspiracy theories help to shed some light on why these events seem particularly prone to the development of such theories and what the media can do to limit the ideas' spread.


Back to the 1990s

Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history. As far back as the mid-1990s, amid a spate of school shootings, Cutting Edge Ministries, a Christian fundamentalist website, found a supposed connection between the attacks and then-President Bill Clinton.

The group's website claimed that when lines were drawn between groups of school-shooting locations across the U.S., they crossed in Hope, Arkansas, Clinton's hometown. The Cutting Edge Ministries concluded from this map that the "shootings were planned events, with the purpose of convincing enough Americans that guns are an evil that needs to be dealt with severely, thus allowing the Federal Government to achieve its Illuminist goal of seizing all weapons."

Beliefs persist today that mass shootings are staged events, complete with "crisis actors," people who are paid to pretend to be victims of a crime or disaster, all as part of a conspiracy by the government to take away people's guns. The idea has been linked to such tragedies as the 2018 Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida, and the Sandy Hook Elementary attack that resulted in the deaths of 20 children in Newtown, Connecticut, in 2012.

These beliefs can become widespread when peddled by prominent people. U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has been in the news recently because of her belief that the Parkland shooting was a "false flag," an event that was disguised to look like another group was responsible. It's not clear, though, in this instance who Rep. Greene felt was really to blame.

Conservative personality Alex Jones recently failed to persuade the Texas Supreme Court to dismiss defamation and injury lawsuits against him by parents of children who were killed in the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting. Jones has, for years, claimed that the Sandy Hook massacre didn't happen, saying "the whole thing was fake," and alleging it happened at the behest of gun-control groups and complicit media outlets.

After the country's deadliest mass shooting to date, with 59 dead and hundreds injured in Las Vegas in 2017, the pattern continued: A conspiracy theory arose that there were multiple shooters, and the notion that the shooting was really done for some other purpose than mass murder.

images.theconversation.com

Shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

Making sense of the senseless

These conspiracy theories are all attempts to make sense of incomprehensibly terrifying events. If a lone shooter, with no clear motive, can singlehandedly take the lives of 60 individuals, while injuring hundreds more, then is anyone really safe?

Conspiracy theories are a way of understanding information. Historian Richard Hofstadter has indicated they can provide motives for events that defy explanation. Mass shootings, then, create an opportunity for people to believe there are larger forces at play, or an ultimate cause that explains the event.

For instance, an idea that a shooter was driven mad by antipsychoticdrugs, distributed by the pharmaceutical industry, can provide comfort as opposed to the thought that anyone can be a victim or perpetrator.

Polls have shown that people worry a lot about mass shootings, and more than 30% of Americans said in 2019 that they refused to go particular places such as public events or the mall for fear of being shot.

If the shootings are staged, or the results of an enormous, unknowable or mysterious effort, then they at least becomes somewhat comprehensible. That thought process satisfies the search for a reason that can help people feel more comfort and security in a complex and uncertain world – especially when the reason found either removes the threat or makes it somehow less random.

Some people blame mass shootings on other factors like mental illness that make gun violence an individual issue, not a societal one, or say these events are somehow explained by outside forces. These ideas may seem implausible to most, but they do what conspiracy theories are intended to do: provide people with a sense of knowing and control.

Conspiracy theories have consequences

Conspiracy theories can spark real-world threats – including the QAnon-inspired attack on a pizza restaurant in 2016 and the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection.

They also misdirect blame and distract from efforts to better understand tragedies such as mass shootings. High-quality scholarship could investigate how to better protect public places. But robust debates about how to reduce events such as mass shootings will be less effective if some significant portion of the public believes they are manufactured.

Some journalists and news organizations have already started taking steps to identify and warn audiences against conspiracy theories. Open access to reputable news sources on COVID-19, for example, has helped manage the misinformation of coronavirus conspiracies.

Explicit and clear evaluation of evidence and sources – in headlines and TV subtitles – have helped keep news consumers alert. And pop-up prompts from Twitter and Facebook encourage users to read articles before reposting.

These steps can work, as shown by the substantial drop in misinformation on Twitter following former President Donald Trump's removal from the platform.

Mass shootings may be good fodder for conspiracy theories, but that does not mean people should actually consume such ideas without necessary context or disclaimers.

Michael Rocque is an Associate Professor of Sociology at Bates College.

Stephanie Kelley-Romano is an Associate Professor of Rhetoric, Film, and Screen Studies at Bates College


This article first appeared on The Conversation on 02.20.21.. You can read it here.

Between the bras, makeup, periods, catcalling, sexism, impossible-to-attain beauty standards, and heels, most men wouldn't survive being a woman for a day without having a complete mental breakdown. So here's a slideshow of some of the funniest Tumblr posts about the everyday struggles that women face that men would never understand.

All photos courtesy of Tumblr.




This article originally appeared on 01.09.16



Articles

Cancel all coal projects to have 'fighting chance' against climate crisis, says UN Chief

"Phasing out coal from the electricity sector is the single most important step to get in line with the 1.5 degree goal."

Photo from Pixabay.
A coal power plant.

This article originally appeared on Common Dreams on 3.3.21. You can read it here.



Emphasizing that the world still has a "fighting chance" to limit global warming with immediate and ambitious climate action, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres on Tuesday urged governments and the private sector to cancel all planned coal projects, cease financing for coal-fired power plants, and opt instead to support a just transition by investing in renewable energy.

"Once upon a time, coal brought cheap electricity to entire regions and vital jobs to communities," Guterres said in a video message at the virtual meeting of the Powering Past Coal Alliance. "Those days are gone."

"Phasing out coal from the electricity sector is the single most important step to get in line with the 1.5 degree goal," Guterres continued, referring to the policy objective of preventing planetary temperatures from rising more than 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels. "Global coal use in electricity generation must fall by 80% below 2010 levels by 2030," he added.

Meeting the 1.5 °C climate target over the course of this decade is possible, according to Guterres, but will require eliminating "the dirtiest, most polluting and, yes, more and more costly fossil fuel from our power sectors."

twitter.com

None

In his address, the U.N. chief outlined three steps that must be taken by public authorities as well as companies to "end the deadly addiction to coal."

  • Cancel all global coal projects in the pipeline;
  • End the international financing of coal plants and shift investment to renewable energy projects; and
  • Jump-start a global effort to finally organize a just transition.

Guterres called on the 37 members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)—a group of relatively rich countries with a greater historical responsibility for extracting fossil fuels and emitting the greenhouse gasses that are causing deadly pollution and destroying the climate—to "commit to phasing out coal" by 2030, while urging non-OECD countries to do so by 2040.

Pleading for an end to the global bankrolling of coal projects and a move toward supporting developing countries in transitioning to clean energy, Guterres asked "all multilateral and public banks—as well as investors in commercial banks or pension funds—to shift their investments now in the new economy of renewable energy."

While stressing that "the transition from coal to renewable[s] will result in the net creation of millions of jobs by 2030," Guterres acknowledged that "the impact on regional and local levels will be varied."

"We have a collective and urgent responsibility to address the serious challenges that come with the speed and scale of the transition," he continued. "The needs of coal communities must be recognized, and concrete solutions must be provided at a very local level."

The U.N. chief urged "all countries to embrace the International Labor Organization's guidelines for a just transition and adopt them as minimum standard to ensure progress on decent work for all."

The coronavirus pandemic, Guterres noted, has "accelerated" the decline in "coal's economic viability," while recovery plans provide an opportunity to bring about a green transformation of the world's infrastructure.

In many parts of the world, a just transition dovetails with guaranteeing universal access to energy, said Damilola Ogunbiyi, CEO and special representative of the secretary-general for Sustainable Energy for All.

Ogunbiyi told conference attendees that almost 800 million people worldwide still lack access to basic electricity, while 2.8 billion are without clean cooking fuels.

"Right now, we're at a crossroads where people do want to recover better, but they are looking for the best opportunities to do that," she said. "And we're emphasizing investments in sustainable energy to spur economic development, create new jobs, and give opportunities to fulfill the full potential."

Articles

Satanists put up a billboard in Florida promoting state's abortion law loophole

Another surprising act of public service from the Satanic Temple.

via The Satanic Temple / Twitter

Unexpected acts of public service.

This article originally appeared on 12.30.20.



In some states, women are put through humiliating and dangerous pre-abortion medical consultations and waiting periods before being allowed to undergo the procedure. In four states, women are even forced to bury or cremate the fetal remains after the procedure.

These government-mandated roadblocks and punitive shaming serve no purpose but to make it more difficult, emotionally damaging, and expensive for women to have an abortion.

Eighteen states currently have laws that force women to delay their abortions unnecessarily: Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin. In a number of other states, mandatory-delay laws have been enacted but are enjoined or otherwise unenforced.

To help women get around these burdensome regulations, The Satanic Temple is promoting a religious ritual it believes provides an exemption from restrictions. According to the Temple, the ritual is supported by the federal Religious Freedoms Restoration Act.

GIF from media3.giphy.com.

Pentagram GIF

The Temple is a religious organization that claims it doesn't believe "in the existence of Satan or the supernatural" but that "religion can, and should, be divorced from superstition."

The Temple says its exemption is made possible by a precedent set by the Supreme Court's 2014 Hobby Lobby decision. According to the Temple, it prevents the government from putting a "burden on free exercise of religion without a compelling reason."

Ironically, Hobby Lobby's case claimed that providing insurance coverage for birth control conflicted with the employer's Christian faith. The Satanic Temple argues that unnecessary roadblocks to abortion conflict with theirs.

via The Satanic Temple

Religious freedoms.

The Temple is promoting the ritual on I-95 billboards in Florida where women must endure an ultrasound and go through pre-procedure, anti-choice counseling before having an abortion.

The Temple's billboards inform women that they can circumvent the restrictions by simply citing a Satanic ritual.

"Susan, you're telling me I do not have to endure a waiting period when I have an abortion?" one of the women on the billboard says.

"That's true if you're a SATANIST!" the other replies.

Next to the ladies is a symbol of a goat head in a pentagram and a message about the ritual.

via The Satanic Temple

Image of The Satanic Temple billboard.

The Temple also provides a letter that women seeking abortions can provide to medical staff. It explains the ritual and why it exempts them from obligations that are an undue burden to their religious practice.

The Temple believes that some medical practitioners may reject its requests. However, it believes that doing so is a violation of religious freedom and it will take legal action if necessary.

"It would be unconstitutional to require a waiting period before receiving holy communion," the temple says in a video. "It would be illegal to demand Muslims receive counseling prior to Ramadan. It would be ridiculous to demand that Christians affirm in writing the unscientific assertion that baptism can cause brain cancers."

"So we expect the same rights as any other religious organization," the video says.

youtu.be

The Satanic Temple’s Religious Abortion Ritual

To perform the ritual, a woman looks into a mirror to affirm their personhood and responsibility to herself. Once the woman is focused and comfortable, they are to recite two of the Temple's Seven Tenets.

Tenet III: One's body is inviolable, subject to one's own will alone. One's body is inviolable, subject to one's own will alone.

Tenet V. Beliefs should conform to one's best scientific understanding of the world. One should take care never to distort scientific facts to fit one's beliefs.

Then they are to recite a personal affirmation: "By my body, my blood. Then by my will, it is done."

The ritual affirms The Temple's belief in personal responsibility and liberty that, coincidentally, mirror that of the U.S. Constitution.

"Satan is a symbol of the Eternal Rebel in opposition to arbitrary authority, forever defending personal sovereignty even in the face of insurmountable odds," the Temple's website reads.

Hail Satan!

There are two types of people in this world – those who panic and fill up their cars with gas when the needle hits 25% or so, and people like me who wait until the gas light comes on, then check the odometer so you can drive the entire 30 miles to absolute empty before coasting into a gas station on fumes.

I mean…it's not empty until it's empty, right?

But just how far can you drive your car once that gas light comes on? Should you trust your manual?

Photo from Pixabay.

I believe that reads empty.

Now, thanks to Your Mechanic sharing this information in a recent post, you can know for sure. Of course, they also want to warn you that driving on a low fuel level or running out of gas can actually damage your car.

Proceed at your own risk.

Graph from Your Mechanic.

How far you can go on empty.

Here's a link to a larger version of the chart.

Now, thanks to Your Mechanic sharing this information in a recent post, you can know for sure. Of course, they also want to warn you that driving on a low fuel level or running out of gas can actually damage your car.

Proceed at your own risk.

These are, of course, approximations that depend on several factors, including how you drive, your car's condition, etc. So don't automatically blame your mechanic if you find yourself stranded on the side of the road.


This article originally appeared on 06.25.21.

Articles

19 countries photoshopped one man to fit their idea of the perfect body

Beauty is in the eye of the photoshopper.

If you ask people what they think the “perfect" body looks like, you're sure to get a range of answers, depending on where the person is from. Last year, Superdrug Online Doctor created a project, “Perceptions of Perfection" that showed what people in 18 countries think the “perfect" woman looks like. The project was a viral hit.

They've recently released the male version.

This time, they asked graphic designers—11 women and eight men—in 19 countries to photoshop the same image to highlight the male beauty standards for their country.

Some of the images are certainly amusing, but the collective result is an interesting look at what people find attractive around the world.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection"

The original photo.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for U.K.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for Venezuela.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for South Africa.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for Spain.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for Serbia.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for Portugal.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for Macedonia.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for Nigeria.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for Indonesia.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for Pakistan.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for Bangladesh.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for China.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for Colombia.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for Croatia.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for Russia.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for Australia.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for United States.

Image from “Perceptions of Perfection”.

Photoshopped for Egypt.


This article originally appeared on 09.14.17

Articles

A viral Twitter thread about body autonomy is a reminder of the ‘fear’ and ‘shame’ women still are forced to confront.

Body autonomy means that a person has the right to whatever they want with their own body.

Body autonomy means a person has the right to whatever they want with their own body.

We live in a world where people are constantly telling women what they can or can't do with their bodies. Women get it form all sides — Washington, their churches, family members, and even doctors.

A woman on Twitter who goes by the name Salome Strangelove recently went viral for discussing the importance of female body autonomy.

Here's how it started.

twitter.com

None

She continued talking about how her mother had a difficult pregnancy.

twitter.com

None

Her mother asked her doctor about the possibility of sterilization.

twitter.com

None

As was typical of the times, she was chastised by her male, Catholic doctor.

twitter.com

None

Her mother was made to feel guilty about simply exploring the medical options about her own body. But later on, a new doctor made her feel more comfortable about her situation.

None

twitter.com

None

None

twitter.com

None

None

twitter.com

None

None

twitter.com

None

None

twitter.com

None

Once her mother had the courage to speak up, her own family members supported her.

None

twitter.com

None

twitter.com

None

Amen.


This article originally appeared on 6.20.21.