Reaganomics, be damned, times are tough and call for drastic measures, say two right-wing thinkers with op-eds in major newspapers today. Emil W. Henry Jr. (pictured), the assistant secretary of the Treasury from 2005 to 2007, and Nicole Galinas, a scholar at the fiscally conservative Manhattan Institute, writing in the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal, respectively, are both on board with rolling out an extensive public works program to cure our economic woes.Henry says that investment in infrastructure is not only responsible in managing a crippled democracy (and a company), it can be done in a way that keeps it in line with Reagan-era doctrine, namely by involving the private sector:Conservatives know that the private sector is better than the government at designing, building, operating and financing infrastructure. This, combined with the magnitude of the spending required, means government will have to tap private capital and expertise. Conservatives can supply leadership in private-sector participation, encourage public-private partnerships, and help ensure that central planning and prioritization are rooted in clinical cost-benefit analysis, not politics. Gelinas goes further than Henry, warning that while private companies can make bails of money one day and ask for bailouts the next, the government can’t rely on anyone if it mismanages an undertaking of this magnitude:… when it comes to responsibility for cost overruns or timeliness of completion on a project that uses an unproven technology in an intricate urban environment, any government that thinks it can transfer such risks to the private sector is probably fooling itself.Investing in infrastructure at a time when the unemployment rate is shooting skyward and wallets are tightening nationwide seemsboth necessary and forward-thinking, especially if we’re putting money toward projects that promotes renewable energy. On the one hand, it’s good to see these voices coming out in agreement. But, I can’t shake the feeling that there’s a an undergirding of reluctance in both of these columns.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

