Obama’s Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said today that he won’t be overturning that 11th-hour rule that Bush imposed on his way out of office. The law basically limits the scope of the Endangered Species Act to not apply to emissions of greenhouse gasses. And since greenhouse gasses are presumably the reason polar bears’ homes are melting, the law basically leaves polar bears unprotected.Environmentalists (Greenpeace, the Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife et al.) are pissed, and for very valid reasons, and say they will be taking the decision to court.But I’m not convinced that Salazar and Obama don’t have other plans, here. I’m glad there is outcry, and I find the pressure being put on the Administration encouraging, but I have a hard time believing Salazar & Co. are just going to sit back while polar bears continue to fall into the ocean and die. Salazar has already said that “this administration is fully committed to the protection and recovery of the polar bear,” and that he is open to other solutions. We also know that this administration has made it a central goal to aggressively tackle greenhouse gas emissions. What Salazar did not want was to tackle greenhouse gas emissions through the Endangered Species Act.There’s an interesting annotated discussion of the polar bear issue by Andrew Revkin, which he wrote when Bush did the deed in the first place. It adds insight to this idea that we shouldn’t be relying solely on the ESA to get our energy policy intact. You can read the whole thing here.What’s your take?
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

