Let's All Say No to 'Stand Your Ground' in Schools

After the Sandy Hook school massacre, you'd think schools would say no to bringing Stand Your Ground laws to campus. Well, Indiana's trying.

America has always been of two minds about teachers. We evoke fond memories of teachers who impacted our lives as we joke about "summers off" and "bankers' hours." We force teachers to hold classes in closets and hallways as we blame them for poor student performance. Over time, the mocking and maligning erode our image of teachers as professionals. We lose sight that teachers deserve input in decisions that impact their working conditions and their lives. No issue crystallizes this more than the post-Newtown fixation on school gun laws.

Last week, Indiana state Rep. Kevin Mahan (R) asked state lawmakers to "consider creative solutions" to prevent a Sandy Hook-type massacre in the Hoosier State. His new tactic in school safety: extending Indiana's castle doctrine into public schools. Better known as "stand your ground," the law allows the use of deadly force when threatened.

"Let's look at the possibility of rather than this person going and retreating into a bathroom and allowing someone to barge down the hallways and start shooting, maybe it is possible we could add that to the castle doctrine to give them the ability to possibly take action to stop any kind of intrusion like that," Mahan said.

If this sounds too far-fetched to believe, an online poll by The Times of Northwest Indiana finds 63 percent of respondents want the stand-your-ground law to include schools. Teachers themselves overwhelmingly reject more guns in schools, and school boards and school administrators repeatedly oppose such measures that could make schools more dangerous, lead to accidental shootings, and put guns in the hands of people who are not adequately trained to shoot in emergency situations.

But what do they know? They're only the professionals to whom the nation entrusts its children daily. None of this has deterred state legislators.

Since the Connecticut school shooting, some 30 states have written bills allowing teachers and school staff to carry firearms, according to data compiled by the National Conference of State Legislatures. So far, their efforts have been met with varying success. In March, South Dakota became the first state to explicitly authorize school employees to carry guns. Similar laws were passed in Alabama, Arizona, and Kansas. Thirteen districts in Arkansas also allow armed school employees.

For the past 10 months, governors and a host of state legislators have pushed a radical guns-in-schools agenda. What we haven't accomplished since Sandy Hook is getting our elected leaders to pass and implement common-sense gun laws. Enacting universal background checks and banning assault weapons would make children exponentially saferin our schools, on our streets, and in their homes. By contrast, bringing stand-your-ground to the schoolhouse and playground is rooted in a fantasy that armed civilians can stop a mass murderer. It is much more likely innocent bystanders get killed. In a classroom, that means someone's child. December 14, 2012 left our nation with a horrified sense of vulnerability. As we wrestle with how something so incomprehensible could happen, we have seen reactions ranging from solidmore gun control and better access to mental health servicesto feeble.

Less than 24 hours after Newtown, a gunman opened fire inside St. Vincent's Hospital in Birmingham, Alabama. He wounded a Birmingham police officer and two employees before he was fatally shot by police. I try to envision a scenario where lawmakers would propose arming doctors and nurses—or expanding stand-your-ground into hospitalsto help prevent tragedies such as St. Vincent's. I try to picture physicians telling them, "That's ludicrous, we don't want this," and lawmakers plowing ahead, regardless of their professional wishes and needs.

And I can't, because it would never happen. With Indiana's stand-your-ground in schools proposal, politicians again failed to get the memo: teachers are grown-ups, not merely tall children.

Want to sign the petition demanding the repeal of Stand Your Ground laws? Click here to say you'll do it.

Bullets as school supplies image via Shutterstock

via Real Time with Bill Maher / YouTube and The Late Late Show with James Corden / YouTube

A controversial editorial on America's obesity epidemic and healthcare by comedian Bill Maher on his HBO show "Real Time" inspired a thoughtful, and funny, response by James Cordon. It also made for a great debate about healthcare that Americans are avoiding.

At the end of the September 6th episode of "Real Time, " Maher turned to the camera for his usual editorial and discussed how obesity is a huge part of the healthcare debate that no one is having.

"At Next Thursday's debate, one of the candidates has to say, 'The problem with our healthcare system is Americans eat shit and too much of it.' All the candidates will mention their health plans but no one will bring up the key factor: the citizens don't lift a finger to help," Maher said sternly.

Keep Reading Show less

There is no shortage of proposals from the, um, what's the word for it… huge, group of Democratic presidential candidates this year. But one may stand out from the pack as being not just bold but also necessary; during a CNN town hall about climate change Andrew Yang proposed a "green amendment" to the constitution.

Keep Reading Show less
Me Too Kit

The creator of the Me Too kit — an at home rape kit that has yet to hit the market — has come under fire as sexual assault advocates argue the kit is dangerous and misleading for women.

The kit is marketed as "the first ever at home kit for commercial use," according to the company's website. "Your experience. Your kit. Your story. Your life. Your choice. Every survivor has a story, every survivor has a voice." Customers will soon be able order one of the DIY kits in order to collect evidence "within the confines of the survivor's chosen place of safety" after an assault.

"With MeToo Kit, we are able to collect DNA samples and other tissues, which upon testing can provide the necessary time-sensitive evidence required in a court of law to identify a sexual predator's involvement with sexual assault," according to the website.

Keep Reading Show less

Villagers rejoice as they receive the first vaccines ever delivered via drone in the Congo

The area's topography makes transporting medicines a treacherous task.

Photo by Henry Sempangi Senyule

When we discuss barriers to healthcare in the developed world, affordability is commonly the biggest concern. But for some in the developing world, physical distance and topography can be the difference between life and death.

Widjifake, a hard-to-reach village in northwestern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) with a population of 6,500, struggles with having consistent access to healthcare supplies due to the Congo River and its winding tributaries.

It can take up to three hours for vehicles carrying supplies to reach the village.

Keep Reading Show less
via Keith Boykin / Twitter

Fox News and President Trump seem like they may be headed for a breakup. "Fox is a lot different than it used to be," Trump told reporters in August after one of the network's polls found him trailing for Democrats in the 2020 election.

"There's something going on at Fox, I'll tell you right now. And I'm not happy with it," he continued.

Some Fox anchors have hit back at the president over his criticisms. "Well, first of all, Mr. President, we don't work for you," Neil Cavuto said on the air. "I don't work for you. My job is to cover you, not fawn over you or rip you, just report on you."

Keep Reading Show less