You may not have known (because it’s kind of inconceivable), but the EPA hasn’t been regulating carbon dioxide thus far because the agency didn’t regard it as a pollutant-despite the fact that it damages our environment and the health of the people in it.Today that changed. The EPA announced that it has found that carbon dioxide (along with a handful of other greenhouse gases) poses a threat to public health and contributes to climate change.Kate Sheppard at Grist has the details:“There will be a 60-day public comment period on the EPA finding itself, after which it will be entered in the Federal Register, the government’s official publication for rules and regulations. The agency would then be legally required to start regulating CO2 emissions, though the EPA can decide the timing, sequence, and scope of any regulations.The EPA could regulate a wide range of polluting entities, but the agency is likely to focus first on two main sources of pollution: cars and stationary pollution points like power plants and major industrial sources, including chemical and cement manufacturers.”So it’s unclear exactly how this will be implemented. Sheppard says that we could get uniform (tighter) emissions standards for cars as early as August. But the point is we now have the EPA as an ally in our collective effort to keep the world in decent shape for humanity.You can get all the dry primary documents and find out how to take part in the public comment process over at the EPA site.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

