If national polls are any indication, the race for president is going to be a squeaker again. But, as the pundits ceaselessly remind us, the national polls may not matter all that much because we dole out electoral votes state-by-state. This interactive map from the L.A. Times lets you assign the swing states (broadly defined) to McCain or Obama. Choose your own (mis)adventure! We try it out after the jump.If we take these data from the very recent Quinnipiac University poll, Florida goes to McCain, Ohio goes to Obama, and Pennsylvania goes to Obama.Oregon, Washington, Michican, Minnesota, and Delaware all voted blue in the last four elections, so we’ll give them to Obama. Missouri was solidly red in the last two elections: it goes to McCain. He also gets Nevada and Colorado. People talk about them as being swing states this year, but they’ve voted republican recently.At this point it’s 258-254 with Obama in the lead. That leave us with four states left: New Mexico, Iowa, Wisconsin and New Hampshire. These data (halfway down the page) show Obama leading in Wisconsin and New Hampshire and McCain up slightly in New Mexico.In our highly speculative scenario (map below) Obama wins regardless of how Iowa goes. So what’d we miss? Explore the outcomes yourself with the L.A. Times map here (the New York Times also has a good one).
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

