News

Society

Science

Health

Culture

Subscribe

Realtors share the 5 ‘funniest,’ ‘weirdest’ things they’ve encountered while showing a house

From pentagrams to naked vacationers.

By

Ryan Reed

By  Ryan Reed
Add to Google News
realtors, homeownership, funny realtor stories, funny homeownership stories, weird realtor stories
Photo credit: Canva, ASphotostudio (left/right, cropped) / Andy Dean Photography (middle, cropped) – These are some of the funniest and weirdest things realtors have encountered on the job.

Perhaps it depends on the geographic location or the number of clients they take on in a year, but for whatever reason, some realtors encounter a lot of bizarre things on the job. (My first real estate pro, in her decades of trying to help people buy and sell houses, witnessed so much crazy stuff that she wrote an entire book about that subject. True story!)

So, what are the weirdest, funniest situations realtors have experienced at work? Well, the best way to find out is to consult strangers on the Internet. Many agents, sharing comfortably with online anonymity, have shared their wildest stories—a lot of tales that, frankly, would have been uncomfortable to witness in person but are super entertaining with distance and the passage of time.

It’s hard to narrow down a list of favorites, given that Reddit is filled with realtor anecdotes—scroll around long enough, and you’ll read about awkwardly open bathrobes, terrifying images carved in Styrofoam insulation, and unexpected hogs. But certain stories rise to the top. Here are five classic examples of reality gone surreal.

1. The pentagram

In one case, a realtor wrote that they showed a house to a friendly but “eccentric” couple—and everyone left a bit freaked out.

“We walked into a vacant home, and it had nothing out of the ordinary at first,” they wrote. “First words out of the wife’s mouth are ‘Can you feel it?’ I’m like, ‘Feel what?’ Husband responds, ‘Yes, I can feel it.’ She says to me, ‘There is negative energy in this home. Something has happened here.’ I’m like, ‘Yeah, okay.’ We walked into the backyard, and there is a pentagram painted on the home and burned into the yard. She’s like, ‘I knew it. I knew it!’ And I’m standing there dumbfounded like. ‘WTF!’ I guess I’m not in tune with the spirit world.”

2. The unbothered underwear man

This one is more unnatural than supernatural, but still…

“Hosted an open house for another agent,” someone shared. “Home had tenants in it that were supposed to be gone. One of them came home 2 hours early and proceeded to strip down to his underwear, sit on the couch, turn on the TV, and smoke for the remainder of the open house.”

3. The naked vacationer

“Vacant” doesn’t always mean vacant—at least not in this case.

“I was showing a ‘vacant’ lake house once,” one Redditor wrote.” No furniture, no utilities. I had shown every room but the back bedroom. Middle of the day, we open the door, and there’s a man sleeping face down completely uncovered in his birthday suit on an inflatable mattress. We slowly backed out and left. After a few calls, it was determined that the owner’s brother had decided to take a mini vacation to the lake house and hadn’t told anybody.”

4. The creepy note

One Redditor recalled doing a “video tour” for some out-of-town clients at a “fairly remote cabin.” Like in our other example, the owner—who’d stayed behind to “wrangle” the dogs—is described as friendly but “eccentric.” But that didn’t prepare the realtor for this strange situation.

“She’s following behind me to answer questions as I’m videoing and narrating,” they shared. “I get to the bedroom, and as I’m panning around the room, there is a sticky note that says ‘Help me. I’m in danger.’ I immediately am freaked out and paused my video to check with her, and she says, ‘I’m fine. It’s just a joke.’ Definitely weirded out, I go upstairs to video the second and third bedrooms. In the first bedroom, I find her grown-ass son asleep in the bed, so I awkwardly leave the room and go into the next one. There I find her grown-ass daughter laying in bed, playing on her phone. Just so weird, and needless to say my clients passed on the house, but we had some good laughs about it. The house still hasn’t sold and has since been re-listed as a FSBO [For Sale By Owner].”

5. The non-nefarious break-in

We’re mixing things up for the last entry—in this case, the realtor themselves stirred up what sounds like a wacky sitcom plot. It happened 10 years ago, when they were new to the job, showing their second home ever. They were so “hyper-focused” on the client’s questions, they wound up locking their purse inside the house.

“My Jeep wasn’t locked, so I got in and pretended I was looking down, returning texts on my invisible phone,” they wrote. “I looked up to wave as they pulled out. Once they turned the corner, I stalked around the house like a burglar trying every door and window, so worried a neighbor would see me and confront me or call the police or, worse, someone else would pull up for a showing. I finally found an unlocked window behind a hedge and hoisted myself up an uncomfortable height to flop my body through the window, landing on a table and knocking over a lamp. Somehow nothing broke, [and] I put everything back then unlocked the Supra [lock box] again so I could lock back up, chill AF like it never even happened, other than the huge dirt stripe across my shirt from balancing precariously, ass out the window. So yeah, I broke into the second home I showed.”

Amazing. If you’re reading this as someone planning to sell their home, you may want to follow some expert tips on the staging process—from painting interior spaces to adding key accessories. One thing you will probably want to avoid, if possible: being naked inside, face down on an inflatable mattress, during a showing.

Add to Google News

Tags

advertisement

More for You

  • Italian man claims to be ‘human cheetah’ with lightning-fast reflexes
    Photo credit: Canva – A man with fast reflexes.
    ,

    Italian man claims to be ‘human cheetah’ with lightning-fast reflexes

    “I blinked and I missed it”

    Mark Wales

    At first glance, this probably looks like a camera trick. Ken Lee, an Italian content creator, has built a massive online following by doing something that doesn’t quite feel real. Viewers refer to him as the “human cheetah” because it appears he has near-instant reflexes.

    Grabbing objects out of the air with uncanny precision, flicking clothespins and lighters, and throwing a blur of punches and kicks at impossible speeds, it is easy to call him unbelievable. Half the audience thinks his viral speed videos are fake. The other half is just as convinced they are watching something incredibly rare.

    Hands so fast they blur time

    In the video above, a timer runs to confirm its authenticity. In what looks like half a second, he reaches out and snags the lighter from the table. To prove it is real, he does it twice.

    Having amassed millions of followers on his TikTok page, the identity behind the mysterious influencer remains largely unknown. Active since around 2022, with almost 100 million accumulated likes, Lee has cultivated a fandom around his self-proclaimed “Superhero per Hobby!”

    Do you believe it is real? Is this person the fastest human alive? Many followers cannot wait for the next video to be posted. Plenty of his fervent fans are Italian, so sifting through the remarks takes a bit of hunting. Here are some comments that sum up how much people enjoy the fun and the spectacle:

    “Ken lee the fastest and the best”

    “Most dangerous human”

    “Is this what the lighter sees before my homie steals it”

    “It was sped up during he grabbed the lighter, if u count up with the timer u would be off by like 0,5 seconds whenever he grabs the lighter.”

    “If the flash were human”

    “How is it possible to get such powers ?”

    “I blinked and I missed it”

    People love good entertainment

    The awe of peak performance attracts people to watch elite athletes, musicians, or even dancers. There is something that deeply satisfies all of us when a human appears to push a skill to its limit. Whether it is real or fake seems to matter less than the opportunity to chime in on some good entertainment.

    How far could any of us go by practicing and repeating a particular motion over and over until it is mastered? Beneath the flashy nickname and his viral speed videos, Lee’s content has a way of drawing people in. This is not a superpower. Just repetition. Focus. Obsession. And maybe some digital wizardry.

    Testing the science of speed

    If you wish to question the validity of Lee’s performances, maybe some basic science can help. Human reaction time is not just a reflex. A 2024 study found that the nervous system can fine-tune responses in real time. Practice can make movements appear almost automatic.

    It has been well established in research that the gap between seeing something and responding has a limit. A 2025 study concluded that the most elite extremes allow for reaction times of 100 milliseconds. At that speed, the human brain can barely process that something has happened.

    Science explains Lee is not necessarily moving as fast as we might perceive him to be. And therein lies all the fun of it. We cannot prove it is real, nor can we actually prove that it is fake.

    Maybe Lee is the “fastest man alive” or the so-called “human cheetah.” Or maybe he is just a remarkable entertainer. Either way, he has clearly tapped into something strange and fascinating: a blend of human ability and fantasy that people do not want to miss.

    To give context to Lee’s videos, watch this performance on Tú Sí Que Vales:

    Keep Reading →
  • Despite all the likes, literallys and dropped g’s, English isn’t decaying before our eyes
    Photo credit: LisaStrachan/iStock via Getty Images – Fear not: There isn’t anything that needs saving.
    ,

    Despite all the likes, literallys and dropped g’s, English isn’t decaying before our eyes

    Why “bad” English is nothing new.

    Good Partner

    Valerie M. Fridland

    Valerie M. Fridland

    As a linguistics professor, I’m often asked why English is decaying before our eyes, whether it’s “like” being used promiscuously, t’s being dropped deleteriously or “literally” being deployed nonliterally.

    While these common gripes point to eccentric speech patterns, they don’t point to grammatical annihilation. English has weathered far worse.

    Let’s start with something we can all agree on: Old English, spoken from approximately A.D. 450 to 1100, is pretty unintelligible to us today. Anyone who’s had the pleasure of reading “Beowulf” in high school knows how different English back then used to sound. Word endings did a lot more grammatical work, and verbs followed more complicated patterns. Remnants of those rules fuel lingering debates today, such as when to use “whom” over “who,” and whether the past tense of “sneak” is “snuck” or “sneaked.”

    The language went on to experience centuries of tumult: Viking invasions, which introduced Old Norse influence; Anglo-Norman French rule, which shifted the language of the elite to French; and 18th-Century grammarians, who dictated norms with their elocution and grammar guides.

    In that time, English has lost almost all of the more complex linguistic trappings it was born with to become the language we know and – at least, sometimes – love today. And as I explain in my new book, “Why We Talk Funny: The Real Story Behind Our Accents,” it was all thanks to the way that language naturally evolves to meet the social needs of its speakers.

    From dropping the ‘l’ to dropping the ‘g’

    The things we tend to label as “bad” or sloppy English – for instance, the “g” that gets lost from our -ing endings or the deletion of a “t” when we say a word like “innernet” – actually reflect speech habits that are centuries old.

    Take, for example, “often.” Originally spoken with the “t,” that pronunciation gradually became less favored around the 15th century, alongside that “l” in “talk” and the “k” in know. Meanwhile, the “s” now stuck on the back of verbs like “does” and “makes” began as a dialectal variant that only became popular in 16th-century London. It gradually replaced “th” whenever third persons were involved, as in “The lady doth protest too much.”

    While dropping the “l” in talk may have been initially frowned upon, today it would be strange if you pronounced the letter. And the shift makes sense: It smoothed out some linguistic awkwardness for the sake of efficiency.

    If people learned to look at language more like linguists, they might come around to seeing that there is more than one perspective on what good speech consists of.

    And yes, that absolutely is a sentence ending with a preposition – something many modern grammar guides discourage, even though the idea only took hold after 18th-century grammarian Robert Lowth intimated it was a less elegant choice based on the model of Latin.

    Though Lowth voiced no hard and fast rule against it, many a grammar maven later misconstrued his advice as an admonition. Just like that, a mere suggestion became grammatical law.

    The rise of the grammar sticklers

    Many of today’s ideas about what constitutes correct English are based on a singular – often mistaken – 19th-century view of the forces that govern our language.

    In the late 18th century, the English-speaking world began experiencing class restructuring and higher literacy rates. As greater class mobility became possible, accent differences became class markers that separated new money from old money.

    Emulation of upper-crust speech norms became popular among the nouveau riche. With literacy also on the rise, grammarians and elocutionists raced to dictate the terms of “proper” English on and off the page, which led to the rise of usage guides and dictionaries that were eager to sell a certain brand of speech.

    Another example of grammarian angst reconfiguring the view of an otherwise perfectly fine form is the droppin’ of the “g.” It became so tied to slovenly speech that it was branded with an apostrophe in the 19th century to make sure no one missed its lackadaisical and nonstandard nature.

    Up until the 19th century, however, no one seemed to care whether one pronounced it as “-in” or “-ing.”

    Evidence suggests that -ing wasn’t even heard as the correct form. Many elocution guides from the 18th century provide rhyming word pairs like “herring/heron,” “coughing/coffin” and “jerking/jerkin,” which suggest that “-in” may have been the preferred pronunciation of words ending with “-ing.” Even writer and satirist Jonathan Swift – a frequent lobbyist for “proper” English – rhymes “brewing” with “ruin” in his 1731 poem “Verses on the Death of Dr. Swift, D.S.P.D..”

    Embrace the change

    Language has always shifted and evolved. People often bristle at changes from what they’ve known to what is new. And maybe that’s because this process often begins with speakers that society usually looks less favorably on: the young, the female, the poor, the nonwhite.

    But it’s important to remember that being disliked and bad are not the same thing – that today’s speech pariahs are driven by the same linguistic and social needs as the Londoners who started going with “does” instead of “doth” or dropped the “t” in often.

    So if you think the speech that comes from your lips is the “correct” version, think again. Thou, like every other English speaker, art literally the product of centuries of linguistic reinvention.

    This article originally appeared on The Conversation. You can read it here.

    Keep Reading →
  • 10 boys and 10 girls were left alone in separate houses and the different results are just wild
    Photo credit: Ian Taylor Photographer – Two young children play in the grass.
    ,

    10 boys and 10 girls were left alone in separate houses and the different results are just wild

    The premise was simple but high stakes.

    Adam Albright Hanna

    GOOD Staff

    It sounds like the plot of William Golding’s Lord of the Flies. However, in the mid-2000s, it was a very real and very controversial reality television experiment.

    Footage from the UK Channel 4 documentary Boys and Girls Alone is captivating audiences all over again. It offers a fascinating and chaotic look at what happens when you remove parents from the equation.

    The premise was simple but high stakes. Twenty children, aged 11 and 12, were split into two groups by gender. Ten boys and ten girls were placed in separate houses and told to live without adult supervision for five days.

    The Setup

    While there were safety nets in place, the day-to-day living was entirely up to the kids. A camera crew was present but instructed not to intervene unless safety was at risk. The children could also ring a bell to speak to a nurse or psychiatrist.

    The houses were fully stocked with food, cleaning supplies, toys, and paints. Everything they needed to survive was there. They just had to figure out how to use it.

    The Boys: Instant Chaos

    In the boys’ house, the unraveling was almost immediate. The newfound freedom triggered a rapid descent into high-energy anarchy.

    They engaged in water pistol fights and threw cushions. In one memorable instance, a boy named Michael covered the carpet in sticky popcorn kernels just because he could.

    The destruction eventually escalated to the walls. The boys covered the house in writing, drawing, and paint. But the euphoria of freedom eventually crashed into the reality of consequences.

    “We never expected to be like this, but I’m really upset that we trashed it so badly,” one boy admitted in the footage. “We were trying to explore everything at once and got too carried away in ourselves.”

    Their attempts to clean up were frantic and largely ineffective. Nutrition also took a hit. Despite having completed a cooking course, the boys survived mostly on cereal, sugar, and the occasional frozen pizza. By the end of the week, the house was trashed, and the group had fractured into opposing factions.

    The Girls: Organized Society

    The girls’ house looked like a different planet.

    In stark contrast to the mayhem next door, the girls immediately established a functioning society. They organized a cooking roster, with a girl named Sherry preparing their first meal. They baked cakes. They put on a fashion show. They even drew up a scrupulous chores list to ensure the house stayed livable.

    While their stay wasn’t devoid of interpersonal drama, the experiment highlighted a fascinating divergence in socialization. Left to their own devices, the girls prioritized community and maintenance. The boys tested the absolute limits of their environment until it broke.

    The documentary was controversial when it aired, with critics questioning the ethics of placing children in unsupervised situations for entertainment. But what made it so enduring, and why footage keeps resurfacing years later, is what it reveals about how kids are socialized long before anyone puts them in a house together. The boys weren’t born anarchists and the girls weren’t born organizers. They arrived at those houses already shaped by years of being told, implicitly and explicitly, what boys do and what girls do. Whether that’s a nature story or a nurture story is the question the documentary keeps asking without quite answering, which is probably why people are still watching and arguing about it nearly two decades later.

    This article originally appeared two years ago. It has been updated.

    Keep Reading →

advertisement

dog, plants, vegetation, garden, reseed
Environment

Wildlife reserves and gardens alike can be regrown thanks to dogs wearing backpacks with seeds

water, fog harvesting, water crisis, environment
Environment

How the ‘fog harvesting’ women of Morocco are influencing how desert areas get drinking water

fanny pack, cash, feel good story, wholesome, humanity
News

Florida man found $30K in a fanny pack in a Wawa bathroom. He knew exactly what to do.

exercise, wellness, motivation, optimization culture, burnout
Health

More women are rejecting ‘optimization culture’ for realistic wellness plans

Two persons petting a cat while unpacking boxes in their new room.
Everyday Economics

What a roommate can save you in 100 US cities: 2026 study

Sign Up for the Daily Good!

Advertisement

Explore More Media Stories

See All
Fear not: There isn’t anything that needs saving.
Culture

Despite all the likes, literallys and dropped g’s, English isn’t decaying before our eyes

Good Partner
Boys and Girls Alone, child psychology, gender differences, social experiment, reality TV
Culture

10 boys and 10 girls were left alone in separate houses and the different results are just wild

Adam Albright Hanna & GOOD Staff
Steph Curry, girls in sports, gender equity, Under Armour, youth advocacy
Media

9-year-old girl asks Steph Curry why his shoes aren’t in girls’ sizes. The response was perfect.

GOOD Staff & Adam Albright-Hanna
Emperor penguins, BBC Earth, David Attenborough, Antarctica, nature documentary
Media

A BBC crew broke ‘cardinal rule’ of nature documentaries to save trapped penguins

Adam Albright Hanna & GOOD Staff