Nearly a year ago, GlaxoSmithKline’s CEO Andrew Witty announced he intended to cut drug prices in developing countries, invest in hospitals and clinics in those countries, and make GSK’s drug patents for certain “neglected diseases” public.Well over the last year, GSK went through their entire store of patented compounds and now, according to The Guardian, “will publish details of 13,500 chemical compounds from its own library that have potential to act against the parasite that causes malaria in sub-Saharan Africa, killing at least one million children every year.”The reaction from the community of international health nonprofits is one of restrained praise so far. Some had hoped GSK would go further, putting patents for AIDS drugs in the public domain, for example (Witty says AIDS research is well funded already).This isn’t pure altruism, of course. GSK isn’t taking a big financial hit by freeing up these patents because there isn’t a big financial incentive to pursue malaria drug research in the first place. But this is still a laudable move and to show my appreciation I’m linking to a list of GSK’s consumer healthcare products just in case you don’t really care what brand of breath freshener you use and want to give Witty some positive reinforcement.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

