If you can’t bare to read this sentence because it effects you negatively, than your going to wont to visit Learn Your Damn Homophones, which is a nice compliment to the Economist‘s stylish “Dos and Don’ts” of writing.Learn Your Damn Homophones is awesomely hilarious. It tackles affect vs. effect, compliment vs. complement, discreet vs. discrete, and even versus vs. verses-and with panache. Although flawless grammar is by no means the be-all and end-all of good writing, bad grammar can severely obfuscate any idea a writer intends to communicate. I’m astonished at how poorly I understand (and how often I mangle) the English language. So I’ll take any help (and laughs) I can get.Via HTML Giant. Grammar afficionados might remember that site’s David Foster Wallace-inspired Grammar Challenge from last year (read: December), which proved difficult for its very literate commenters.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

