[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZLSXjGptCUThe Wall Street Journal revealed yesterday that Mary Beth Maxwell, the founding executive director of the labor advocacy group American Rights at Work, is a strong contender to be President-elect Obama’s Secretary of Labor.Obama has been doing his best to balance his reported desire to form a “team of rivals” with the pressures of fielding a diverse Cabinet that represents all the demographics that helped him secure the highest office in the land. Maxwell appears to fill both requirements: She’s recognized as an innovator in her field and her pro-union stance has won her the support of high-ranking officials in the AFL-CIO and Service Employees International Union. She also qualifies under what Chris Matthews calls “the many faces of Bennetton” rubric; Maxwell is a lesbian and the adopted mother of a seven-year-old African-American child. More importantly, she also satisfies the suggestion made by Slate’s Jacob Weisberg: that Obama just find really smart people for his Cabinet.In order to introduce you to Maxwell, here is a video from a lecture she gave in 2006 at a forum held by the international human rights group Breakthrough. It’s about workers’ rights to organize and fight for better pay, working conditions, etc.
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

