Not sure if you’ve been following the news about the recent uptick in Maoist violence in India, where the rebels are still vying for communist control of several states. My guess is you have not, because it isn’t getting a ton of play in the news over here. Today, however, there was a flurry of stories, thanks to a new Human Rights Watch report, which seems to be showing that the conflict is taking quite a toll on schools as well.In the past month, 14 state-run schools have been attacked. In the past year? Forty two. Interestingly, this appears to be an example of both the human rights group and the rebels using schools to garner the attention of the media and the Indian government. The rebels know that if you come near a school in any conflict it raises the stakes considerably from a political and newsmaking perspective, and HRW knows that the ongoing violence from said rebels doesn’t garner the kind of headlines that school attacks do.This is not to say that the Maoist’ attacks are without consequences-they’re clearly not-but it does seem to me that the current media message-that Maoists are sabotaging schools-might not be the most nuanced portrayal of what’s going on in this four-decade-long conflict. It caught my attention, though.Map via
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

