As yesterday’s story on Teach for America rose through the ranks of the NYT‘s most e-mailed, bloggers picked up steam.Alexander Russo, of This Week In Education, weighed in:Teach For America suggests study to gauge impact of participation on civic involvement, doesn’t like results suggesting participants not more likely to be engaged in civic life, claims study doesn’t measure real impact of the program. Ryan Sager at True/Slant pointed out that while the study is not yet available online (keep checking here), he doesn’t buy the criticism:Most TFA grads stay involved in education and many stay in the classroom. We’re not trying to make these folks better people; we’re trying to improve the school system. And TFA appears to be doing that in a host of ways.And Gawker’s rendition:A survey finds that idealistic youngsters who complete two years teaching at a poor school for Teach For America subsequently become burned-out cynics with “lower rates of civic involvement” than their non-TFA peers. Schools: Destroying American idealism since 1639.As the organization grows in size and in years, different research will become possible.How do you see Teach for America’s influence unfolding?Photo via
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

