This news seems somewhat ironic in light of our recent Transparency video, but technology giants are banding together to fight governments censoring what their citizens can say and view on the Internet. Some heavy-hitters involved in the new human rights consortium: Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! Companies known to sell web-filtering software to civil-liberty-stripping regimes: Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! (Hmmm …)Well, according to the new pact they entered into, the companies have two years to change their ways. The newly formed Global Network Initiative seeks to bring oppressed web users the freedom to surf like their brethren in other countries–forcing censor-happy governments to align their standards with internationally accepted laws. The announcement of the free speech endeavor helps mark the 60th Anniversary year of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was adopted at the United Nations on Dec. 10, 1948.Via Scientific American‘s 60-Second Science Blog.(Photo from Flickr user M3Li55)
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

