At a talk I went to the other night, Nora Ephron said that while she thought the job of First Lady seemed like a really great gig-it was a shame that you had to marry a guy in order to get it.I actually think that the last time it was really cool, Eleanor Roosevelt ruled the roost.As for our current occupant, it sometimes feels to be an antiquated custom, a placeholder from another time and place.And today’s announcement that Michelle Obama will adopt childhood obesity as next year’s focus feels a bit, well, underwhelming. But to her credit, it is but an extension of her healthy eating campaign and in this way, an offshoot of her highly publicized White House garden. Politico reports that her initiative will include public speeches and travel, not to mention “taking her case to Congress if that would be helpful.”In this month’s Atlantic, Caitlin Flanagan reviews Thomas McNamee’s book about Alice Waters and in doing so, examines the potential dark side of school gardens:What evidence do we have that participation in one of these programs-so enthusiastically supported, so uncritically championed-improves a child’s chances of doing well?I get that Michelle Obama is not a fan of the type of policy making that dominated Hillary Clinton’s rein.But is Michelle treading a bit too lightly insofar as her legacy is concerned? Or is this exactly how first ladies are expected to act?Photo via
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

