A new study appearing the Journal of Economic Perspectives examines grade inflation, a little quirk of college politics that pits majors against one another and can serve as a badge of honor for students from schools known to be tough relative to kids at more coddling schools.Per my college experience, as a chemical engineering major at Cornell, grade inflation was totally foreign. I was routinely annoyed by peers in softer majors with more subjective grading and friends at other schools (cough, Stanford, cough, cough, Harvard) whose curves were set to Bs or B+s, whereas mine were typically set to B-/C+.According to a piece on the Miller-McCune website, the new study finds that for the most part, the trend of raising mean grades wasn’t born out–or, at least at the University of Michigan, wasn’t happening noticeably fast. Further, if it is taking place, the authors say, it’s a victimless crime and makes students/customers happy. There are two notable exceptions, where profs graded harshly (outside of science, math, and engineering classes): in required courses, where departments are weeding out potential majors from posers, and extremely popular classes with objective (read: multiple choice) tests.That explains why my 700-person Introduction to Wine class was deceptively tough.Photo by Flickr user jakevol2
Tags
advertisement
More for You
-
14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations
These trailblazers redefined what a woman could be.
Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.
-
Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories
Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.
While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.
When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.
Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.
advertisement

