Exercising, enabling, and encouraging the vote is not a left vs. right issue. It’s not Democrat vs. Republican. It’s not liberal vs. conservative. Voting is American. It’s our civic duty. It’s as American as mom and apple pie. In fact, voting protects both mom and apple pie. If you’re a politician and you mess with mom or apple pie, We The People have the right to remove you from office.


But here’s a pet peeve of mine: the conventional wisdom in some circles that the right is actively working to suppress voter turnout. I have never, ever heard of anyone, anywhere that is actively trying to suppress voter turnout. Having traveled the country from upstate New York to the border in San Diego, from Texas to Washington State, and having met with many people of all political persuasions I have a broad perspective on this issue. Everyone I know—and I know folks from the grassroots all the way up to the top of this mess of a political system—wants to see maximum voter participation.

For years, polling has shown that far more people in this country openly label themselves “conservative” rather than “liberal.” Moderates are shrinking as a category, and though they are smaller in number than self-identified conservatives, they outnumber liberals as well. The latest Gallup poll on the issue:

“Political ideology in the U.S. held steady in 2011, with 40 percent of Americans continuing to describe their views as conservative, 35 percent as moderate, and 21 percent as liberal. This marks the third straight year that conservatives have outnumbered moderates, after more than a decade in which moderates mainly tied or outnumbered conservatives.”

So why would anyone on the right want to suppress turnout? In fact, if you want to be ideological about it, folks on the right should want way more people voting. And we do. This meme that the right wants to depress voter turnout is just hateful fiction. I’m tired of it. It comes from the same people who call tea partiers racist Nazis and who say the right is engaged in a ‘war on women.’ Oh, and we want dirty water and air. It’s rhetoric that has no place in a real debate on real issues.

What is the real issue we should be talking about? One of the most important is the lack of participation in the system at the most basic level. Put simply, too few people are voting. And regardless of party or political ideology, we should all be concerned.

We’re all disgusted with a Congress that is, directly or indirectly, responsible for many of the nation’s problems. How disgusted? In November 2010, the approval rating of Congress was just 17 percent—the lowest in our history.

In that same month–when the approval rate of Congress was at an all-time low–86 percent of incumbent members of the U.S. House of Representatives were reelected! Imagine working for a company that is losing money, lays off half its workers, and pollutes the river but then gives its top executives huge bonuses. Something clearly is wrong with such a system, and it’s high time we did something about it.

The way to regain control of Washington is to regain control of Congress. Congress is the most powerful branch of government, and the most powerful

members of Congress are entrenched House incumbents. In order to change things, We the People, of all parties and political persuasions must vote. And most importantly, we must vote in the primaries.

Primaries, remember, are where very few people bother to vote and where a small fraction of the electorate decides who will run in November and return to Washington. As a result, low turnout in primaries represents a real opportunity. That’s because just a small percentage of voters in any district can change the outcome of the primary and, therefore, change who will end up representing that district in Congress.

Why am I talking about primaries just before the general election of 2012? Because now is the time to look forward to 2014 and 2016. Trust me when I tell you that the political parties and their beloved incumbents already are. And they have a plan: maintain the status quo so you have no say in the governance of the nation.

Instead of talking about the nefarious plans of the “right” or the “left,” let’s talk about the real problems in our political system. Now, I’m not naive. I’m sure there are bad people out there, but they are few and far between, and they’re on both sides. And there’s certainly no ‘orchestrated effort’ to suppress voter turnout.

We’ve got to fight back hard against these ridiculous polarizing accusations on both sides from ideologues who profit from the politics of hate. Because the reality is, the great majority of Americans are just good people who love our country, our moms…and apple pie.

Mark Meckler is the President of Citizens for Self Governance and the Co-Founder and Former National Coordinator of the Tea Party Patriots.

Image (cc) flickr user Gemstone

  • Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away
    Dogs have impressive observational powers.Photo credit: Canva

    Reddit user Girlfriendhatesmefor’s three-year-old pitbull, Otis, had recently become overprotective of his wife. So he asked the online community if they knew what might be wrong with the dog.

    “A week or two ago, my wife got some sort of stomach bug,” the Reddit user wrote under the subreddit /r/dogs. “She was really nauseous and ill for about a week. Otis is very in tune with her emotions (we once got in a fight and she was upset, I swear he was staring daggers at me lol) and during this time didn’t even want to leave her to go on walks. We thought it was adorable!”

    His wife soon felt better, butthe dog’s behavior didn’t change.

    pregnancy signs, dogs and pregnancy, pitbull behavior, pet intuition, dog overprotection, Reddit stories, viral Reddit, dog instincts, canine emotions, dog owner tips
    Otis knew before they did. Canva

    Girlfriendhatesmefor began to fear that Otis’ behavior may be an early sign of an aggression issue or an indication that the dog was hurt or sick.

    So he threw a question out to fellow Reddit users: “Has anyone else’s dog suddenly developed attachment/aggression issues? Any and all advice appreciated, even if it’s that we’re being paranoid!”

    The most popular response to his thread was by ZZBC.

    Any chance your wife is pregnant?

    ZZBC | Reddit

    The potential news hit Girlfriendhatesmefor like a ton of bricks. A few days later, Girlfriendhatesmefor posted an update and ZZBC was right!

    “The wifey is pregnant!” the father-to-be wrote. “Otis is still being overprotective but it all makes sense now! Thanks for all the advice and kind words! Sorry for the delayed reply, I didn’t check back until just now!”

    Redditors responded with similar experiences.

    Anecdotal I know but I swear my dog knew I was pregnant before I was. He was super clingy (more than normal) and was always resting his head on my belly.

    realityisworse | Reddit

    So why do dogs get overprotective when someone is pregnant?

    Jeff Werber, PhD, president and chief veterinarian of the Century Veterinary Group in Los Angeles, told Health.com that “dogs can also smell the hormonal changes going on in a woman’s body at that time.” He added the dog may “not understand that this new scent of your skin and breath is caused by a developing baby, but they will know that something is different with you—which might cause them to be more curious or attentive.”

    The big lesson here is to listen to your pets and to ask questions when their behavior abruptly changes. They may be trying to tell you something, and the news may be life-changing.

    This article originally appeared last year.

  • Throughout history, women have stood up and fought to break down barriers imposed on them from stereotypes and societal expectations. The trailblazers in these photos made history and redefined what a woman could be. In doing so, they paved the way for future generations to stand up and continue to fight for equality.

  • ,

    Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

    Mass shootings and conspiracy theories have a long history.

    While conspiracy theories are not limited to any topic, there is one type of event that seems particularly likely to spark them: mass shootings, typically defined as attacks in which a shooter kills at least four other people.

    When one person kills many others in a single incident, particularly when it seems random, people naturally seek out answers for why the tragedy happened. After all, if a mass shooting is random, anyone can be a target.

    Pointing to some nefarious plan by a powerful group – such as the government – can be more comforting than the idea that the attack was the result of a disturbed or mentally ill individual who obtained a firearm legally.


Explore More Articles Stories

Articles

Man’s dog suddenly becomes protective of his wife, Internet clocks the reason right away

Articles

14 images of badass women who destroyed stereotypes and inspired future generations

Articles

Why mass shootings spawn conspiracy theories

Articles

11 hilarious posts describe the everyday struggles of being a woman